Sutcliffe et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 10

STIPULATION AND ORDER BETWEEN DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK AND PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFF TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Respond due by 2/17/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/18/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Matthew G. Ball (SBN No. 208881) matthew.ball@klgates.com Megan F. Cesare-Eastman (SBN NO. 253845) megan.cesare-eastman@klgates.com K&L GATES LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 882-8200 Fax: (415) 882-8220 12 Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice to be filed) irene.freidel@klgates.com Jennifer J. Nagle (pro hac vice to be filed) jennifer.nagle@klgates.com K&L GATES LLP State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 Tel: (617) 261-3100 Fax: (617) 261-3175 13 Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. C 11-06595 JCS NOTICE OF STIPULATION BETWEEN DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national bank, for itself and d/b/a WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive. Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero Defendant. _____________________________________ Complaint Date: December 21, 2011 Trial Date: None Set 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS TO THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE COURT 1 2 JUDGE, PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE, THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD, 3 AND ALL OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(a), plaintiffs, Vicki and Richard 4 5 Sutcliffe (“plaintiffs”), and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their 6 respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 7 WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint on December 21, 2011; and 8 WHEREAS, Wells Fargo was served with the Complaint on December 28, 2011; and 9 WHEREAS, plaintiffs have agreed as a courtesy to grant Wells Fargo an extension of time to 10 file its response to the Class Action Complaint; and WHEREAS, such an extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already 11 12 fixed by Court order; and WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Wells Fargo agree that neither party will be prejudiced by such an 13 14 extension; 15 //// 16 //// 17 //// 18 //// 19 //// 20 //// 21 //// 22 //// 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 28 1 STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that defendant Wells Fargo 2 Bank, N.A.’s deadline to file a response to plaintiffs’ Class Action Complaint shall be continued until 3 Friday, February 17, 2012. 4 5 K& L GATES LLP 6 7 Dated: January 17, 2012 By: /s/ Matthew G. Ball Matthew G. Ball Megan F. Cesare-Eastman Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice to be filed) Jennifer J. Nagle (pro hac vice to be filed) 8 9 10 11 12 SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS ANGELIDES & BARNERD LLC 13 14 Dated: January 17, 2012 By: /s/ Deborah Rosenthal (with permission) Deborah Rosenthal Attorneys for Vicki and Richard Sutcliffe 15 16 HANLY CONROY BIERSTEIN SHERIDAN FISHER & HAYES LLP 17 Paul J. Hanly , Jr.* Jayne Conroy* Mitchell M. Breit* Andrea Bierstein 18 19 20 GIBBON, BARRON, & BARRON PLLC 21 Bradford D. Barron* Zachary T. Barron* 22 MCCALLUM METHVIN & TERRELL, PC James Michael Terrell* 23 R NIA Spero FO seph C. LI ER *pro hac vice to be filed ED ORDER Judge Jo A H 28 RT 27 O IT IS S NO 26 Dated: January 18, 2012 UNIT ED 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C 2 STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?