Sutcliffe et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
10
STIPULATION AND ORDER BETWEEN DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK AND PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFF TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Respond due by 2/17/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 1/18/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Matthew G. Ball (SBN No. 208881)
matthew.ball@klgates.com
Megan F. Cesare-Eastman (SBN NO. 253845)
megan.cesare-eastman@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel.: (415) 882-8200
Fax: (415) 882-8220
12
Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice to be filed)
irene.freidel@klgates.com
Jennifer J. Nagle (pro hac vice to be filed)
jennifer.nagle@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: (617) 261-3100
Fax: (617) 261-3175
13
Attorneys for Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
7
8
9
10
11
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. C 11-06595 JCS
NOTICE OF STIPULATION BETWEEN
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
AND PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD
SUTCLIFFE TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
bank, for itself and d/b/a WELLS FARGO
HOME MORTGAGE, a division of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.; and DOES 1-100,
inclusive.
Judge: Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero
Defendant.
_____________________________________ Complaint Date: December 21, 2011
Trial Date: None Set
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS
TO THE HONORABLE JOSEPH C. SPERO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE COURT
1
2
JUDGE, PLAINTIFFS VICKI AND RICHARD SUTCLIFFE, THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD,
3
AND ALL OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(a), plaintiffs, Vicki and Richard
4
5
Sutcliffe (“plaintiffs”), and defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), by and through their
6
respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
7
WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed a Class Action Complaint on December 21, 2011; and
8
WHEREAS, Wells Fargo was served with the Complaint on December 28, 2011; and
9
WHEREAS, plaintiffs have agreed as a courtesy to grant Wells Fargo an extension of time to
10
file its response to the Class Action Complaint; and
WHEREAS, such an extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already
11
12
fixed by Court order; and
WHEREAS, plaintiffs and Wells Fargo agree that neither party will be prejudiced by such an
13
14
extension;
15
////
16
////
17
////
18
////
19
////
20
////
21
////
22
////
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
////
27
28
1
STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties that defendant Wells Fargo
2
Bank, N.A.’s deadline to file a response to plaintiffs’ Class Action Complaint shall be continued until
3
Friday, February 17, 2012.
4
5
K& L GATES LLP
6
7
Dated: January 17, 2012
By:
/s/ Matthew G. Ball
Matthew G. Ball
Megan F. Cesare-Eastman
Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice to be filed)
Jennifer J. Nagle (pro hac vice to be filed)
8
9
10
11
12
SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS
ANGELIDES & BARNERD LLC
13
14
Dated: January 17, 2012
By:
/s/ Deborah Rosenthal (with permission)
Deborah Rosenthal
Attorneys for Vicki and Richard Sutcliffe
15
16
HANLY CONROY BIERSTEIN
SHERIDAN FISHER & HAYES LLP
17
Paul J. Hanly , Jr.*
Jayne Conroy*
Mitchell M. Breit*
Andrea Bierstein
18
19
20
GIBBON, BARRON, & BARRON PLLC
21
Bradford D. Barron*
Zachary T. Barron*
22
MCCALLUM METHVIN & TERRELL, PC
James Michael Terrell*
23
R NIA
Spero
FO
seph C.
LI
ER
*pro hac vice to be filed
ED
ORDER
Judge Jo
A
H
28
RT
27
O
IT IS S
NO
26
Dated: January 18, 2012
UNIT
ED
25
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
24
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
2
STIPULATION RE: RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
CASE NO.: C 11-06595 JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?