Mora v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
36
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 07/20/2012. (sclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
18
) Case No. 11-6598-SC
)
Plaintiffs,
) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
) PREJUDICE
v.
)
)
U.S. BANK N.A., as Trustee for the )
holders of the First Franklin
)
Mortgage Loan Trust Mortgage Pass- )
Through Certificates, Series 2005- )
FF9, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
)
INC., NATIONAL DEFAULT SERVICING
)
CORPORATION, and DOES 1 THROUGH
)
20,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
19
On June 7, 2012, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs Tarcicio and
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
TARCICIO MORA and REMEDIOS MORA,
20
Remedios Mora's ("Plaintiffs") Corrected First Amended Complaint
21
with leave to amend certain claims therein.
22
Order").
23
complaint within thirty (30) days of the signature date of this
24
Order, the Court will dismiss this case against all Defendants with
25
prejudice."
26
7, 2012, thus Plaintiffs had until Monday, July 9, 2012 to file
27
their amended pleading.
28
because July 7 fell on a Saturday.
ECF No. 34 ("June 7
The Court stated: "If Plaintiffs do not file an amended
Id. at 17.
The signature date on the order was June
They had until July 9 rather than July 7
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1).
1
The deadline has passed and Plaintiffs have not filed their
2
amended pleading or otherwise communicated with the Court.
3
Therefore, pursuant to the June 7 Order, the Court orders this case
4
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to all Defendants.
5
application filed by Defendants on July 16, 2012, seeking dismissal
6
of this case on the grounds stated above, is DENIED as moot.
7
No. 35.
The ex parte
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
Dated: July 20, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ECF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?