Brandon v. Safeway Inc.

Filing 23

ORDER continuing motion from 10/12/12 to 1/18/13 @ 9 a.m., Motions terminated: 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadlines Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Safeway Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/16/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Monty Agarwal (191568) Rhonda S. Goldstein (250387) Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415.471.3100 Facsimile: 415.471.3400 E-Mail: monty.agarwal@aporter.com E-Mail: rhonda.goldstein@aporter.com Attorneys for Defendant SAFEWAY INC. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 LAWRENCE BRANDON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 14 15 Plaintiff, v. Case No.: C 11-06614 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 17 18 19 SAFEWAY INC., a Delaware corporation with its Principal Place of Business in Pleasanton, California. Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C 11-06614 SI WHEREAS, at the Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) held in this action on 1 2 April 6, 2012, the Court set the following schedule for Defendant Safeway Inc’s Motion for 3 Summary Judgment (“Motion”), as set forth in the Civil Pretrial Minutes issued on April 11, 2012 4 (Dkt. No. 21): 5 Filing date: September 7, 2012 6 Opposition due: September 21, 2012 7 Reply due: September 28, 2012 8 Hearing date: October 12, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.; WHEREAS, at the April 6 CMC Plaintiff Lawrence Brandon and Defendant Safeway Inc. 9 10 (collectively, the “Parties”) discussed with the Court that the Parties were discussing a potential 11 mediation of the action, and intended to seek a modification to the schedule for the Motion in the 12 event that they were able to agree to mediate; WHEREAS, the Parties have reached an agreement to mediate the action on June 22, 2012, 13 14 and therefore wish to extend the briefing schedule for the Motion by a period of ninety (90) days; 15 and WHEREAS, the agreed-upon schedule is not for the purpose of delay, promotes judicial 16 17 efficiency and will not cause prejudice to any party; THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their 18 19 respective counsel, subject to approval of the Court as follows: 1. 20 21 including December 6, 2012; 2. 22 23 The deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion is hereby extended up to and including December 20, 2012; 3. 24 25 The deadline by which Defendant must file the Motion is hereby extended up to and The deadline for Defendant’s reply to the Motion is extended up to and including December 27, 2012; 4. 26 The hearing on the Motion is hereby set for January 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., or as 27 soon thereafter as the Court’s schedule may allow; 28 /// -1STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C 11-06614 SI 5. 1 2 The undersigned Parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this Stipulation as an Order. 3 4 Dated: May 11, 2012 ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 5 6 By: /s/ Rhonda S. Goldstein* Monty Agarwal Rhonda S. Goldstein Attorneys for Defendant SAFEWAY INC. 7 8 9 10 Dated: May 11, 2012 FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 11 12 By: /s/ Danielle A. Stoumbos Danielle A. Stoumbos Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 14 15 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 5/16/12 Dated: _________________________ Hon. Susan Illston United States District Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 * I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 28 -2STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT C 11-06614 SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?