Brandon v. Safeway Inc.
Filing
23
ORDER continuing motion from 10/12/12 to 1/18/13 @ 9 a.m., Motions terminated: 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadlines Re: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Safeway Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 1/18/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Susan Illston.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/16/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Monty Agarwal (191568)
Rhonda S. Goldstein (250387)
Three Embarcadero Center, 7th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: 415.471.3100
Facsimile: 415.471.3400
E-Mail: monty.agarwal@aporter.com
E-Mail: rhonda.goldstein@aporter.com
Attorneys for Defendant
SAFEWAY INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
LAWRENCE BRANDON, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No.: C 11-06614 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES RE:
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
16
17
18
19
SAFEWAY INC., a Delaware corporation with
its Principal Place of Business in Pleasanton,
California.
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
C 11-06614 SI
WHEREAS, at the Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) held in this action on
1
2
April 6, 2012, the Court set the following schedule for Defendant Safeway Inc’s Motion for
3
Summary Judgment (“Motion”), as set forth in the Civil Pretrial Minutes issued on April 11, 2012
4
(Dkt. No. 21):
5
Filing date: September 7, 2012
6
Opposition due: September 21, 2012
7
Reply due: September 28, 2012
8
Hearing date: October 12, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.;
WHEREAS, at the April 6 CMC Plaintiff Lawrence Brandon and Defendant Safeway Inc.
9
10
(collectively, the “Parties”) discussed with the Court that the Parties were discussing a potential
11
mediation of the action, and intended to seek a modification to the schedule for the Motion in the
12
event that they were able to agree to mediate;
WHEREAS, the Parties have reached an agreement to mediate the action on June 22, 2012,
13
14
and therefore wish to extend the briefing schedule for the Motion by a period of ninety (90) days;
15
and
WHEREAS, the agreed-upon schedule is not for the purpose of delay, promotes judicial
16
17
efficiency and will not cause prejudice to any party;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, through their
18
19
respective counsel, subject to approval of the Court as follows:
1.
20
21
including December 6, 2012;
2.
22
23
The deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to the Motion is hereby extended up to and
including December 20, 2012;
3.
24
25
The deadline by which Defendant must file the Motion is hereby extended up to and
The deadline for Defendant’s reply to the Motion is extended up to and including
December 27, 2012;
4.
26
The hearing on the Motion is hereby set for January 18, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., or as
27
soon thereafter as the Court’s schedule may allow;
28
///
-1STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
C 11-06614 SI
5.
1
2
The undersigned Parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this
Stipulation as an Order.
3
4
Dated: May 11, 2012
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
5
6
By: /s/ Rhonda S. Goldstein*
Monty Agarwal
Rhonda S. Goldstein
Attorneys for Defendant
SAFEWAY INC.
7
8
9
10
Dated: May 11, 2012
FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP
11
12
By: /s/ Danielle A. Stoumbos
Danielle A. Stoumbos
Attorneys for Plaintiff
13
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
18
19
5/16/12
Dated: _________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
*
I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the
other signatories.
28
-2STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES
RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
C 11-06614 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?