Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. MicroStrategy, Inc.

Filing 147

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 146 REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION. Motion Hearing set for 1/24/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2012)

1 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar. No. 170151)
[e-mail]
2 Sean S. Pak (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
3
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
4 [e-mail]
Howard Y. Chen (Bar No. 265015)
5 [e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
6 SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
7
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
9
Attorneys for Defendant
10 MICROSTRATEGY INC.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14

15 VASUDEVAN SOFTWARE, INC.,
Plaintiff ,

16
17

vs.

18 MICROSTRATEGY INC.,
19

CASE NO. 11-6637-RS

Defendant.

STIPULATION REQUESTING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND
FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF
DATE TO HEAR MOTION

20
21

Hon. Richard Seeborg

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-06637-RS
-1STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION

1
2

STIPULATION
WHEREAS, plaintiff Vasudevan Software, Inc. (“VSI”) on December 12, 2012 filed its

3 Motion for Sanctions (Dkt. No. 145);
4

WHEREAS, the current deadline for defendant MicroStrategy Inc. (“MicroStrategy”) to

5 respond with an opposition to VSI’s motion pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(a) is December 26, 2012,
6 which would require MicroStrategy’s attorneys to work on the holiday;
7

WHEREAS, the current deadline for VSI to reply pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d) is January

8 2, 2013;
9

WHEREAS, the current date for the Hon. Richard Seeborg to hear VSI’s Motion for

10 Sanctions is January 17, 2013;
11

WHEREAS, granting the extensions of time below will have no impact on any other

12 deadlines in this action;
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated by and between VSi and MicroStrategy that:
1. MicroStrategy shall have until January 4, 2013 to respond with an opposition to
VSI’s Motion for Sanctions;
2. VSI shall have until January 14, 2013 to respond with a reply to MicroStrategy’s
opposition to VSI’s Motion for Sanctions; and
3. For the convenience of the Court and the parties, VSI shall present its Motion for
Sanctions before the Hon. Richard Seeborg on January 24, 2013.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 14, 2013

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash
Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar. No. 170151)
[e-mail]
Sean S. Pak (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679)
[e-mail]
Howard Y. Chen (Bar No. 265015)
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

Case No. 11-06637-RS
-2STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION

50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3

Attorneys for Defendant
MICROSTRATEGY INC.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: December 14, 2013

By: /s/ Jordan Connors
Brooke A. M. Taylor
Lead Attorney
WA Bar No. 33190 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, Washington 98101-3000
T: [phone]
F: [phone] (fax)
Stephen E. Morrissey
CA Bar 187865
[e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
T: [phone]
F: [phone] (fax)
Michael F. Heim
TX Bar No. 09380923 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Leslie V. Payne
TX Bar No. 00784736 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Eric J. Enger
TX Bar No. 24045833 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Nick P. Patel
TX Bar No. 24076610 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 6710
Houston, Texas 77002-2912
T: [phone]
F: [phone](fax)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VASUDEVAN SOFTWARE, INC.
Case No. 11-06637-RS
-3-

STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

3 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
4 perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
5
6
Dated: December 14, 2012

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Kash

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-06637-RS
-4STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 
I hereby certify that on this 14th day of December 14, 2012, a true and correct copy of the

3 foregoing document was served on all parties via CM/ECF and/or email to counsel.
4
5
6
7

By /s/ Jennifer A. Kash
Jennifer A. Kash

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-06637-RS
-5STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION

1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2

2012
17
DATED: December ___, 2013

3
4
5
6

The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-06637-RS
-6STIPULATION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND AND REPLY TO PLAINTIFF VSI’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND FURTHER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE TO HEAR MOTION