Taverniti v. Astrue

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re 18 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge James Ware on May 9, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

6
7
8

13
14
15
16

R NIA

S

FO

LI

ER

A

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10

12

re
mes Wa
Judge Ja

Attorneys for Defendant

9

11

ED
ORDER

H

160 Spear Street, 8th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5

RT

4

O
IT IS S

NO

3

UNIT
ED

2

MELINDA L. HAAG CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
ELIZABETH BARRY, CSBN 203314
Special Assistant United States Attorney

RT
U
O

1

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

DALENA M. TAVERNITI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)

CASE NO.: C-3:11-cv-06659-JW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR A FIRST EXTENSION FOR
DEFENDANT TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

17

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the

18

approval of the Court, that the Commissioner shall have a 30-day extension of time in which to answer

19

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. The extension is requested because meaningful review of

20

this case is not possible, as the Commissioner has not yet received the administrative record.

21

///

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2

The Commissioner’s answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is due May 7, 2012; it will now be due June
6, 2012.

3
4

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 7, 2012

5
6

/s/ Margaret Mullin Weems
(as authorized via Robert Weems via telephone)
MARGARET MULLIN WEEMS
Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney

9
10

Dated: May 7, 2012

11
12

By /s/ Elizabeth Barry
ELIZABETH BARRY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

13
14

ORDER

15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

May 9, 2012
DATED:________________________

17

_________________________________
JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2