Lambson v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
Filing
24
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS, Case referred to Private ADR re 18 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation filed by Vernon Michael Lambson. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/25/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Vernon Michael Lambson
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Marriott International, Inc.,
,
et al.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
CASE NO. ______________________
C 11-06669 CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
Private mediation with David Rotman.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9
October 3, 2012, 180 days from date of this stipulation.
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
4/6/2012
____________________________
/s/ Peter M. Hart
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
4/6/2012
____________________________
/s/ Adam P. KohSweeney
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
RT
U
O
UNIT
ED
Dated: May 25, 2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
__________________________________
S
X
9
9
O OR
IT IS S
FO
RT
A
H
ER
er
R. Brey
LI
NO
harles
Judge C
R NIA
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DERED
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?