Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. et al v. Stalt, Inc. et al
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Carlos E. Duque
(Pro Hac Vice)
Massachusetts Bar No. 676221
103 Concord Ave. Ste. 2-2
Somerville, Massachusetts 02143
(317) 270-3353
duque@bostonianlaw.com
Chan Xu, SBN 277566
2240 Bay Street #304
San Francisco, California 94123
(415) 595-1471
chanxuesq@gmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, INC.
and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, )
INC. and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING,
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
STALT, INC, HILLARD M. STERLING, )
ESQ., FREEBORN & PETERS LLP and )
)
DOES 1 through 30, inclusive.
)
)
Defendants.
)
____ )
CASE NO. 3:11-cv-06679-SC
Honorable Samuel Conti
NOTICE OF STIPULATED
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
[FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(B)]
21
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
22
23
Having reached a mutually agreeable out-of-court settlement, Plaintiffs ADVANCED
24
MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS INC. and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING hereby stipulate to
25
voluntarily dismissal of the above referenced action as to Defendant STALT, INC., with
26
prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Defendant STALT, INC. hereby notices
27
consent to the same.
28
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
3:11-cv-06679-SC
1
1
2
3
4
Respectfully submitted,
DATED: September 13, 2012
/s/ Carlos E. Duque
Carlos E. Duque, Esq.
Chan Xu, Esq.
5
13
onti
amuel C
Judge S
RT
ER
H
15
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
14
RT
U
O
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
11
Attorney for Defendant
STALT, INC.
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
3:11-cv-06679-SC
FO
10
DATED: September 13, 2012
LI
9
/s/ Richard D. Givens
Richard D. Givens, Esq.
A
8
S
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS INC.;
and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING, INC.
UNIT
ED
6
2
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?