Advanced Multilevel Concepts, Inc. et al v. Stalt, Inc. et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Carlos E. Duque (Pro Hac Vice) Massachusetts Bar No. 676221 103 Concord Ave. Ste. 2-2 Somerville, Massachusetts 02143 (317) 270-3353 duque@bostonianlaw.com Chan Xu, SBN 277566 2240 Bay Street #304 San Francisco, California 94123 (415) 595-1471 chanxuesq@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, INC. and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS, ) INC. and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) STALT, INC, HILLARD M. STERLING, ) ESQ., FREEBORN & PETERS LLP and ) ) DOES 1 through 30, inclusive. ) ) Defendants. ) ____ ) CASE NO. 3:11-cv-06679-SC Honorable Samuel Conti NOTICE OF STIPULATED VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL [FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(B)] 21 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 22 23 Having reached a mutually agreeable out-of-court settlement, Plaintiffs ADVANCED 24 MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS INC. and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING hereby stipulate to 25 voluntarily dismissal of the above referenced action as to Defendant STALT, INC., with 26 prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(B). Defendant STALT, INC. hereby notices 27 consent to the same. 28 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 3:11-cv-06679-SC 1 1 2 3 4 Respectfully submitted, DATED: September 13, 2012 /s/ Carlos E. Duque Carlos E. Duque, Esq. Chan Xu, Esq. 5 13 onti amuel C Judge S RT ER H 15 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 14 RT U O 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 11 Attorney for Defendant STALT, INC. 16 N F D IS T IC T O R 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 3:11-cv-06679-SC FO 10 DATED: September 13, 2012 LI 9 /s/ Richard D. Givens Richard D. Givens, Esq. A 8 S 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ADVANCED MULTILEVEL CONCEPTS INC.; and ABLE DIRECT MARKETING, INC. UNIT ED 6 2 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?