State of Oklahoma v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston signed on 10/1/12granting ( 6850 ) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI; granting (34) Stipulation in case 3:11-cv-06686-SI Regarding Filing and Response to Second Amended Complaint (of State of Oklahoma) (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA Bar No. 88500)
[e-mail]
JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA Bar No. 209134)
[e-mail]
FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA Bar No. 191479)
[e-mail]
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SHARP CORPORATION and
SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
[additional parties and counsel listed in signature block]

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI
MDL No. 1827

16
17
18
19

This Document Relates To:
Case No. 3:11-cv-06686 SI
STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

20
21
22

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING FILING AND
RESPONSE TO SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, plaintiff State of Oklahoma (“Oklahoma”) filed an Amended and
Restated Complaint (“Amended Complaint”) in the above-captioned on April 12, 2012;
WHEREAS, certain Defendants (“Stipulating Defendants”) filed a motion to
dismiss the Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”);
WHEREAS, the Court denied in part and granted in part the Motion to Dismiss on
September 12, 2012 with leave to amend;

7

WHEREAS, Oklahoma desires to file a Second Amended Complaint;

8

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and

9
10
11
12
13

among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Oklahoma, on the one
hand, and the Stipulating Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:
1.

Oklahoma shall file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of

the filing of this Stipulation;
2.

The Stipulating Defendants shall move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise

14

respond to the Second Amended Complaint within forty-five (45) days of the filing of the

15

Second Amended Complaint.

16
17

3.

In computing these time periods, Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure shall govern.

18
19

Dated: September 26, 2012.
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
JOHN M. GRENFELL
JACOB R. SORENSEN
FUSAE NARA
ANDREW D. LANPHERE
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

20
21
22
23
24
25

By:

/s/ Jacob R. Sorensen
Jacob R. Sorensen

26

Attorneys for Defendants SHARP
CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION

27
28

-1501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

NOSSAMAN LLP
CHRISTOPHER A. NEDEAU (CA Bar No. 81297)
CARL L. BLUMENSTEIN (CA Bar No. 124158)
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5

By:

/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

8
9

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
JAMES G. KREISSMAN (CA Bar No. 206740)
HARRISON J. FRAHN IV (CA Bar No. 206822)
2550 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13

By:

14
15

/s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV
Attorneys for Defendants CHIMEI INNOLUX
CORPORATION (F/K/A CHI MEI
OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION), CHI
MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC., CHI MEI
CORPORATION, and CMO JAPAN CO., LTD.

16
17
18

22

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA Bar No. 34097)
STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (CA Bar No. 131093)
DEREK F. FORAN (CA Bar No. 224569)
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522

23

By:

19
20
21

/s/ Stephen P. Freccero
Stephen P. Freccero

24
25

Attorneys for Defendants EPSON IMAGING
DEVICES CORPORATION AND EPSON
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.

26
27
28

-2501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
ROBERT E. FREITAS (CA Bar No. 80948)
JASON S. ANGELL (CA Bar No. 221607)
JERRY CHEN (CA Bar No. 229318)
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5

By:

/s/ Robert E. Freitas
Robert E. Freitas

6
7

Attorneys for Defendant HANNSTAR DISPLAY
CORPORATION

8

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
KENT M. ROGER (CA Bar No. 95987)
MICHELLE KIM-SZROM (CA Bar No. 252901)
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

By:

/s/ Kent M. Roger
Kent M. Roger

14

Attorneys for Defendants HITACHI, LTD.,
HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD.(N/K/A JAPAN
DISPLAY EAST, INC.), and HITACHI
ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC.

15
16
17

PAUL HASTINGS LLP
Holly A. House (CA Bar No. 136045)
Kevin C. McCann (CA Bar No. 120874)
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

18
19
20
21
22

By:

/s/ Kevin C. McCann
Kevin C. McCann

23

Attorneys for Defendants LG DISPLAY CO.,
LTD. and LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.

24
25
26
27
28

-3501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
ROBERT D. WICK (pro hac vice)
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4

By:

5

/s/ Robert D. Wick
Robert D. Wick

6

Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., and
SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

7
8
9

WHITE & CASE LLP
CHRISTOPHER M. CURRAN (admitted pro hac vice)
JOHN H. CHUNG (pro hac vice)
MARTIN M. TOTO (admitted pro hac vice)
KRISTEN J. MCAHREN (admitted pro hac vice)
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14

By:

15
16

/s/ John H. Chung
John H. Chung
Attorneys for Defendants TOSHIBA AMERICA
ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.,
TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION
SYSTEMS, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION,
and TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.

17
18
19

MCCALLUM, METHVIN & TERRELL, P.C.
PHILIP W. MCCALLUM (pro hac vice)
ROBERT G. METHVIN, JR. (pro hac vice)
JAMES M. TERRELL (pro hac vice)
NICHOLAS W. ARMSTRONG (CA Bar No. 270963)
2201 Arlington Avenue South
Birmingham, AL 35205
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

20
21
22
23
24

By:

/s/ James M. Terrell
James M. Terrell

25
26

Attorneys for Plaintiff STATE OF OKLAHOMA

27

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence

28

in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories thereto.
-4501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

10/1
Dated: _______________, 2012.

4
5

_________________________________________
Honorable Susan Illston
U.S. District Court Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-5501057037v1

STIPULATION REGARDING
SECOND AMENDED COMPL.
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827