State of Oklahoma v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 Stipulation and Order Regarding Filing and Response to State of Oklahoma Second Amended Complaint, LG Display's deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint will be March 11, 2013. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/6/2012. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HOLLY A. HOUSE (SB# 136045) [e-mail]
KEVIN C. MCCANN (SB# 120874) [e-mail]
SEAN D. UNGER (SB# 231694) [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street
Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
LEE F. BERGER (SB# 222756) [e-mail]
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
875 15th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

18

20

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-6686 SI:

21

STATE OF OKLAHOMA,

22

24
25

Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI
MDL No. 1827

19

23

CASE NO. 3:11-cv-06686 SI

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING FILING AND
RESPONSE TO STATE OF OKLAHOMA
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Judge: Honorable Susan Y. Illston

vs.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-6686 SI
Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING RESPONSE TO SAC

1

WHEREAS, LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. (collectively, “LG

2

Display”), other Defendants in the above-captioned matter, and plaintiff State of Oklahoma

3

(“Oklahoma”) previously entered into a stipulation on September 26, 2012 providing that

4

Defendants shall move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to Oklahoma’s Second Amended

5

Complaint within forty-five (45) days of the filing of that complaint;

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, Oklahoma filed a Second Amended Complaint in the above-captioned matter
on October 25, 2012;
WHEREAS under the September 26 stipulation LG Display’s deadline to respond to the
Second Amended Complaint was therefore set for December 10, 2012;
WHEREAS LG Display and the State of Oklahoma have reached a tentative agreementin-principle resolving this action;
WHEREAS Oklahoma and LG Display agree that LG Display need not respond to the

13

Second Amended Complaint while the parties document the terms of their tentative agreement-in-

14

principle and have reached an agreement whereby LG Display shall have an additional extension

15

of ninety (90) days;

16

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

17

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Oklahoma, on the one hand, and LG

18

Display, on the other hand, that LG Display’s deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise

19

respond to the Second Amended Complaint will be March 11, 2013.

20
21

DATED: December 6, 2012

22

HOLLY A. HOUSE
KEVIN C. MCCANN
LEE F. BERGER
PAUL HASTINGS LLP

23
24

By:

/s/ Lee F. Berger
Lee F. Berger

25

Attorneys for Defendant LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.

26
27

MCCALLUM, METHVIN & TERRELL, P.C.
PHILIP W. MCCALLUM (pro hac vice)

28
Case No. 3:11-cv-6686 SI
Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING RESPONSE TO SAC

1

ROBERT G. METHVIN, JR. (pro hac vice)
JAMES M. TERRELL (pro hac vice)
NICHOLAS W. ARMSTRONG (CA Bar No. 270963)
2201 Arlington Avenue South
Birmingham, AL 35205
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5

By: __________/s/ James M. Terrell________
James M. Terrell

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Oklahoma

7
8
9

ATTESTATION: Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence
in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories thereto.

10
11
12
13
14
15

[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

December 6
Dated: ________________, 2012.
_______________________________
Honorable Susan Illston
U.S. District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-6686 SI
Case No. M 07-md-01827 SI

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING RESPONSE TO SAC