Elliott v. Lewis
Filing
10
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/9/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2011)
**E-filed 11/9/11 **
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
VANCE S. ELLIOT,
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE
COMPLAINT
MARCUS LEWIS,
15
No. C 11-80128 RS
Defendant.
____________________________________/
16
17
18
On June 16, 2011, the Court dismissed this action without prejudice, as plaintiff’s
19
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis had been denied and plaintiff had not paid the
20
filing fee as instructed to maintain the suit. After the case was closed, and without paying the filing
21
fee, plaintiff submitted an amended complaint. The Court denied him leave to file an amended
22
complaint and declined to reopen the case. On October 28, 2011, plaintiff filed an amended
23
complaint. As plaintiff still has not complied with the Court’s instruction to pay the filing fee, his
24
resubmission of an amended complaint does not reopen the case. Further, plaintiff is advised that he
25
may be subject to sanctions if he persists in filing pleadings without paying the filing fee. See Fed.
26
R. Civ. P. 11.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
No. C 11-80128 RS
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE COMPLAINT
1
2
3
Dated: 11/9/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
3
Vance S. Elliott
640 Eddy Street, #218
San Francisco, CA 94109
4
5
6
7
8
DATED: 11/9/11
/s/ Chambers Staff
Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?