CERF SPV I, LLC et al v. Cherokee Investment Partners III, LP
Filing
10
ORDER requiring parties to meet and confer re: pending discovery dispute. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 11/30/2011. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
1
2
3
NOT FOR CITATION
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
EUREKA DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. CV 11-80272 MISC RS (NJV)
CERF SPV I, LLC,
12
ORDER REQUIRING IN PERSON MEET
AND CONFER RE: PENDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTE
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
15
16
(Docket No. 1)
CHEROKEE INVESTMENT
PARTNERS III, L.P., et al.,
Defendants.
/
17
18
The district court has referred all discovery matters in this case to the undersigned, including
19
the motion to quash subpoenas filed by non-parties Zeneca, Inc. (“Zeneca”) and Cherokee Simeon
20
Venture I, LLC (“CSV”). See Doc. Nos. 1, 5. The Court has reviewed the briefs and orders counsel
21
for plaintiff CERF SPV I, LLC (“CERF”), Zeneca, and CSV to engage in an in-person meet and
22
confer on or before December 8, 2011 regarding the pending discovery dispute. See Standing Order,
23
¶ 12. Counsel for CERF shall travel from Sacramento to San Francisco to participate in this meet
24
and confer unless the participants agree otherwise. Counsel shall engage in a meaningful meet and
25
confer regarding outstanding discovery requests and the pending discovery dispute, including but
26
not limited to the non-parties’ assertions of burden and privilege, the scope of any electronic
27
discovery (search terms, cost-shifting, time-line, etc.), efforts to identify documents that can be or
28
already have been obtained from other sources, etc.
1
Within three court days of completing the in-person meet and confer, counsel shall file a
2
single joint letter to the Court informing the Court of the status of the in-person meet and confer. If
3
the participants are unable to resolve their discovery disputes after the in-person meet and confer,
4
the single joint letter to the Court should succinctly set forth their positions on each disputed issue.
5
The joint letter shall not exceed five pages in length.
6
In order to accommodate these further efforts to meet and confer, the hearing scheduled for
7
December 16, 2011 is continued until December 20, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17, 450 Golden
8
Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Counsel for CERF, Zeneca and CSV are ordered to review and follow this Court’s Standing
Order, which is available on the Northern District’s website.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: November 30, 2011
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?