Rochester v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc et al

Filing 14

ORDER REMANDING CASE: Upon consideration of the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Napa. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/3/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-00007-JSW Document13-1 Filed02/02/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 GEORGE ROCHESTER, an Individual Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 vs. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC.; TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.; TAKEDA SAN DIEGO, INC.; TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED; ELI LILLY AND COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 100, Inclusive, Case No. 3:12-cv-00007 JSW Assigned to Hon. Jeffrey S. White [Proposed] ORDER TO REMAND Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND Case3:12-cv-00007-JSW Document13-1 Filed02/02/12 Page2 of 2 1 Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this 2 action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Napa. Each 3 party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the 4 removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 3 Dated: February __, 2012 7 By: 8 The Honorable Jeffrey S. Whyte United States District Judge Northern District of California 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?