Rochester v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc et al
Filing
14
ORDER REMANDING CASE: Upon consideration of the parties' stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Napa. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/3/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2012)
Case3:12-cv-00007-JSW Document13-1 Filed02/02/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
GEORGE ROCHESTER, an Individual
Plaintiffs,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
vs.
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS
AMERICA, INC.; TAKEDA
PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH
AMERICA, INC.; TAKEDA SAN
DIEGO, INC.; TAKEDA
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY
LIMITED; ELI LILLY AND
COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 100,
Inclusive,
Case No. 3:12-cv-00007 JSW
Assigned to Hon. Jeffrey S. White
[Proposed] ORDER TO REMAND
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND
Case3:12-cv-00007-JSW Document13-1 Filed02/02/12 Page2 of 2
1
Upon consideration of the parties’ stipulation, it is hereby ordered that this
2
action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Napa. Each
3
party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the
4
removal of this action and other proceedings in this Court.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
3
Dated: February __, 2012
7
By:
8
The Honorable Jeffrey S. Whyte
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO REMAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?