Boatright v. Aurora Loan Services, LLC et al

Filing 39

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION re 38 . Motions Terminated re: 38 MOTION for Reconsideration Under Rule 59(e) and/or Motion for Reconsideration Under Rule 60(b) of re 37 Order of Dismissal of First Amended Complaint filed by Kenneth Earl Boatright, Jr.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 5/8/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KENNETH E. BOATRIGHT JR., Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C -12-00009 (EDL) ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION v. AUORA LOAN SERVICES, Defendant. / 13 14 On May 7, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order dismissing 15 his first amended complaint and noticed it for hearing on June 5, 2012. Dkt. No. 38. This motion is 16 in violation of Local Rule 7-9, which provides that “[n]o party may notice a motion for 17 reconsideration without first obtaining leave of Court to file the motion” and sets forth the proper 18 procedure for seeking leave to file a motion for reconsideration. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion is 19 stricken without prejudice to refiling if Plaintiff receives leave of Court after complying with the 20 rule. Defendants need not respond to this motion and the hearing noticed for June 5, 2012 is 21 vacated. Plaintiff must comply with Local Rule 7-9 and properly seek leave to file a motion for 22 reconsideration before the Court will consider any such request. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 8, 2012 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?