Cahill v. Hyatt Corporation et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 19 Stipulation (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FOLGER LEVIN LLP Susan Ansberry (CSB No. 121300) sansberry@folgerlevin.com 199 Fremont Street, 23rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.625.1050 Facsimile: 415.625.1091 Attorneys for Defendants Hyatt Corporation and CCHH Burlingame LLC LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER George Duesdieker (CSB No. 95505) george@duesdieker.com 405 El Camino Real, #107 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650.566.9529 Facsimile: 650.618.1844 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jonathan Cahill 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 JONATHAN CAHILL, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-00028-MEJ STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER HYATT CORPORATION, DBA HYATT REGENCY SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT AS AGENT OF CCHH BURLINGAME, LLC, and Doe 1 through Doe 10, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FOLGER LEVIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 12-00028-MEJ 1 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the parties hereto stipulate to a dismissal of 3 this action with prejudice. Each party will bear its own costs and fees. 4 Dated: June 13, 2012 Dated: June 19, 2012 5 FOLGER LEVIN LLP LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER 6 /s/ Susan Ansberry /s/ George Duesdieker 7 Susan Ansberry Attorneys for Defendants Hyatt Corporation and CCHH Burlingame LLC George Duesdieker Attorneys for Plaintiff Jonathan Cahill 8 9 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10 11 It is so ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 June 20 Dated: _______________ , 2012 16 _________________________________________ THE HONORABLE MARIA ELENA JAMES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 777069.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FOLGER LEVIN LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW -2STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ; CASE NO. 12-00028-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?