Jimenez v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 11

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAIME JIMENEZ, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 No. C 12-0104 SI Plaintiff, ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ADR UNIT FOR ASSESSMENT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendants. 13 / 14 On January 5, 2012, plaintiff filed this foreclosure-related action against defendants Bank of 15 America and Recontrust Company. On March 13, 2012, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 16 complaint for failure to state a claim. A hearing is set for defendants’ motion on May 4, 2012. 17 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 2-3, the Court refers this 18 foreclosure-related action to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit for a telephone conference 19 to assess this case’s suitability for mediation or a settlement conference. Plaintiff and Defendants’ 20 counsel shall participate in a telephone conference, to be scheduled by the ADR Unit as soon as possible 21 but no later than May 31, 2012. 22 Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel shall be prepared to discuss the following subjects: 23 (1) Identification and description of claims and alleged defects in loan documents. (2) Prospects for loan modification. (3) Prospects for settlement. 24 25 26 27 28 The parties need not submit written materials to the ADR Unit for the telephone conference. In preparation for the telephone conference, Plaintiff shall do the following: 1 (1) Review relevant loan documents and investigate the claims to determine whether they have merit. (2) If Plaintiff is seeking a loan modification to resolve all or some of the claims, Plaintiff shall prepare a current, accurate financial statement and gather all of the information and documents customarily needed to support a loan modification request. Further, Plaintiff shall immediately notify Defendants’ counsel of the request for a loan modification. (3) Provide counsel for Defendants with information necessary to evaluate the prospects for loan modification, in the form of a financial statement, worksheet or application customarily used by financial institutions. 2 3 4 5 6 7 In preparation for the telephone conference, counsel for Defendants shall do the following. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 (1) If Defendants are unable or unwilling to do a loan modification after receiving notice of Plaintiff’s request, counsel for Defendants shall promptly notify Plaintiff to that effect. (2) Arrange for a representative of each Defendant with full settlement authority to participate in the telephone conference. 11 12 The ADR Unit will notify the parties of the date and time the telephone conference will be held. 13 After the telephone conference, the ADR Unit will advise the Court of its recommendation for further 14 ADR proceedings. The May 4, 2012 hearing date on defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby 15 VACATED. The motion will be reset for hearing, if necessary, after the conclusion of the ADR Unit’s 16 involvement. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: May 1, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?