Solis v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al

Filing 106

ORDER RE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER BRIEFING re 103 104 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/27/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNI ITED STAT DISTR TES RICT COU URT 8 NORTH HERN DIS STRICT O CALIFO OF ORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO D DIVISION N 10 0 HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United o U 11 States Department of Labor, 1 D 12 2 13 3 Plaintiff, v. 14 SEAFO 4 OOD PEDDL LER OF SA RAFAE AN EL, 15 5 16 6 17 7 18 8 C Case No. 12 2-cv-0116 W WHO (NC) O ORDER RE INDIVI E: IDUAL D DEFENDA ANTS’ REQ QUEST TO O S SUBMIT D DOCUMEN AND NTS F FURTHER BRIEFIN R NG R Dkt. No 103, 104 Re: os. 4 INC., db SEAFOO PEDDL ba OD LER; ALPHO ONSE SILV VESTRI; RI ICHARD MAYFI IELD; FIDE CHACO EL ON, Defendants. D Th order ad his ddresses the two letters filed by th individua defendan seeking e s he al nts ion mit e g tion ning discovery m matter 19 permissi to subm evidence supporting their posit pertain to the d 9 he nd nse etter filed ctor ndez. Dkt. N Nos. 20 before th Court, an a respon to any le brief fi by Hec Hernan 0 4. e l ts mit nt of 21 103, 104 By July 1, 2013, the individual defendant may subm “relevan portions o the 1 pts eposition of Mr. Herna f andez and D DOL invest tigator Mich Eastwo hael ood 22 transcrip of the de 2 upport [the individual defendants’] position for why thi discovery is relevant and is y t 23 which su 3 ry.” Dkt. No. 103. No further bri may be filed witho leave of Court. Th N o iefs e out f he 24 necessar 4 w uments on this discove dispute at the July 3, 2013 hea t ery aring. 25 Court will hear argu 5 26 6 IT IS SO OR T RDERED. 27 7 Date: June 27 2013 7, 28 8 Case No. 12-cv-0116 WHO (NC 6 C) ORDER RE: INDIV R VIDUAL DEFEND DANTS’ RE EQUEST ____ __________ __________ _____ Nath hanael M. C Cousins Unit States M ted Magistrate J Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?