Solis v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al
Filing
106
ORDER RE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS AND FURTHER BRIEFING re 103 104 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/27/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNI
ITED STAT DISTR
TES
RICT COU
URT
8
NORTH
HERN DIS
STRICT O CALIFO
OF
ORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO D
DIVISION
N
10
0
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, United
o
U
11 States Department of Labor,
1
D
12
2
13
3
Plaintiff,
v.
14 SEAFO
4
OOD PEDDL
LER OF SA RAFAE
AN
EL,
15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
C
Case No. 12
2-cv-0116 W
WHO (NC)
O
ORDER RE INDIVI
E:
IDUAL
D
DEFENDA
ANTS’ REQ
QUEST TO
O
S
SUBMIT D
DOCUMEN AND
NTS
F
FURTHER BRIEFIN
R
NG
R Dkt. No 103, 104
Re:
os.
4
INC., db SEAFOO PEDDL
ba
OD
LER;
ALPHO
ONSE SILV
VESTRI; RI
ICHARD
MAYFI
IELD; FIDE CHACO
EL
ON,
Defendants.
D
Th order ad
his
ddresses the two letters filed by th individua defendan seeking
e
s
he
al
nts
ion
mit
e
g
tion
ning
discovery m
matter
19 permissi to subm evidence supporting their posit pertain to the d
9
he
nd
nse
etter
filed
ctor
ndez. Dkt. N
Nos.
20 before th Court, an a respon to any le brief fi by Hec Hernan
0
4.
e
l
ts
mit
nt
of
21 103, 104 By July 1, 2013, the individual defendant may subm “relevan portions o the
1
pts
eposition of Mr. Herna
f
andez and D
DOL invest
tigator Mich Eastwo
hael
ood
22 transcrip of the de
2
upport [the individual defendants’] position for why thi discovery is relevant and
is
y
t
23 which su
3
ry.” Dkt. No. 103. No further bri may be filed witho leave of Court. Th
N
o
iefs
e
out
f
he
24 necessar
4
w
uments on this discove dispute at the July 3, 2013 hea
t
ery
aring.
25 Court will hear argu
5
26
6
IT IS SO OR
T
RDERED.
27
7
Date: June 27 2013
7,
28
8
Case No. 12-cv-0116 WHO (NC
6
C)
ORDER RE: INDIV
R
VIDUAL
DEFEND
DANTS’ RE
EQUEST
____
__________
__________
_____
Nath
hanael M. C
Cousins
Unit States M
ted
Magistrate J
Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?