Solis v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al

Filing 171

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNDER CIV. L.R. 72-2 re 165 Stipulation and Proposed Order (correcting 166 Order). Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/19/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN, WEILL & MAZER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 (415) 421-0730 10 11 12 MARC S. MAZER (SBN 081163) mazer@bwmlaw.com BENJAMIN, WEILL & MAZER A Professional Corporation 90 New Montgomery Street, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 421-0730 Attorneys for Defendant SEAFOOD PEDDLER OF SAN RAFAEL, INC. dba SEAFOOD PEDDLER MATTANIAH EYTAN (State Bar No. 68561) DAVID T. CHAPMAN (State Bar No. 207900) LAW OFFICES OF MATTANIAH EYTAN 21 Tamal Vista Blvd., Suite 219 Corte Madera, CA 94925 Telephone: (415) 399-1000 Facsimile: (415) 399-1088 Attorneys for Defendants, Alphonse Silvestri, Richard Mayfield and Fidel Chacon 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 vs. SEAFOOD PEDDLER OF SAN RAFAEL, INC., dba SEAFOOD PEDDLER, a corporation; ALPHONSE SILVESTRI, an individual, RICHARD MAYFIELD, an individual, and FIDEL CHACON, an individual, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV-12-0116 (WHO/NC) ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT FOR MORTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNDER CIV. L.R. 72-2 Hon. William H. Orrick 24 25 Defendants filed an administrative motion under Civ. L.R. 7-11 requesting to exceed the usual 26 five-page limit for a Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge 27 under Civ. L.R. 72-2. Defendants requested five additional pages of briefing, for a total of 10 28 pages, and Plaintiff has stipulated to Defendants’ request. ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PAGES Case No. CV-12-0116 (WHO) 1 Having considered this matter based on the papers before me, I find and order as follows: 2 Good cause appearing, Defendants’ Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limit for Motion 3 for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Under Civ. L.R. 72-2 is hereby 4 GRANTED. Defendants’ brief shall not exceed 10 pages. 5 6 7 8 SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: September _____, 2013 ____________________________ United States District Judge 9 BENJAMIN, WEILL & MAZER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET, SUITE 1400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 (415) 421-0730 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL PAGES Case No. CV-12-0116 (WHO)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?