Solis v. Seafood Peddler of San Rafael, Inc. et al
Filing
261
ORDER ADDRESSING SECRETARY'S MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON DISCOVERY SANCTIONS AND UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 259 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/24/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor,
United States Department of Labor,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
SEAFOOD PEDDLER OF SAN
RAFAEL, INC., dba SEAFOOD
PEDDLER; ALPHONSE SILVESTRI;
RICHARD MAYFIELD; FIDEL
CHACON,
Case No. 12-cv-00116 WHO (NC)
ORDER ADDRESSING
SECRETARY’S MOTION TO
CONTINUE HEARING ON
DISCOVERY SANCTIONS AND
UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
Hearing: April 30, 2014, 11:30 a.m.
Re: Dkt. 259
Defendants.
19
20
21
The Court responds to the Secretary’s request to continue the April 30 hearing.
22
Dkt. 259. Because the Secretary’s counsel did not confer with defendants’ counsel before
23
filing the motion, the Court does not know whether defendants support or oppose the
24
relief requested.
25
The Court is inclined to grant in part the relief requested and to move the hearing
26
to May 7 at 1:00 p.m. The reason to extend the hearing would be so that Mr. Pasker
27
could participate in person. The Secretary’s motion does not explain why Mr. Pasker
28
could not be present on May 7.
Case No. 12-cv-00116 WHO (NC)
ORDER RE: MOTION TO CONTINUE
1
Defendants are ordered to file a response to this order by April 25 at noon, stating
2
whether they have any opposition to moving the hearing to May 7 at 1:00 p.m., and if
3
they do, choosing either April 30 at 4:00 p.m. or May 14 at 2:00 p.m. in the alternative.
4
The Secretary’s motion to continue is taken under submission.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Date: April 24, 2014
___________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 12-cv-00116 WHO (NC)
ORDER RE: MOTION TO CONTINUE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?