Koller v. West Bay Acquistions, LLC et al

Filing 63

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/10/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-00117-CRB Document60-1 Filed12/05/12 Page1 of 2 1 7 GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446) adam@gutridesafier.com SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427) 835 Douglass Street seth@gutridesafier.com KRISTEN SIMPLICIO (State Bar No. 263291) kristen@gutridesafier.com San Francisco, California 94114 Telephone: (415) 271-6469 Facsimile: (415) 449-6469 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 SCOTT KOLLER, AN INDIVIDUAL, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF, THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AND THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WEST BAY ACQUISTIONS, LLC; CHRISTOPER RUNCI, LLC; CHRISTOPHER RUNCI; TODD HARRAKA, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 12-cv-00117 (CRB) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Case3:12-cv-00117-CRB Document60-1 Filed12/05/12 Page2 of 2 1 On December 4, 2012, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice. 2 Having carefully considered the joint stipulation, the Court is of the opinion that it should be 3 GRANTED. The Court hereby dismisses, with prejudice, Plaintiff Scott Koller’s claims against 4 Defendants West Bay Acquisitions, LLC, Christopher Runci, LLC, Christopher Runci, and Todd 5 Harraka. 6 December 10, 2012 12 13 S RT ____________________ Hon. Charles REBreyer, United States E R. D District RD Judge O O Court IS S 16 17 yer s R. Bre harle Judge C ER H 15 IT NO 14 UNIT ED 11 RT U O 10 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 9 FO Dated: LI 8 IT IS SO ORDERED A 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice – CASE NO. 12-CV-00117 (CRB) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?