Koller v. West Bay Acquistions, LLC et al
Filing
63
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/10/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)
Case3:12-cv-00117-CRB Document60-1 Filed12/05/12 Page1 of 2
1
7
GUTRIDE SAFIER LLP
ADAM J. GUTRIDE (State Bar No. 181446)
adam@gutridesafier.com
SETH A. SAFIER (State Bar No. 197427)
835 Douglass Street
seth@gutridesafier.com
KRISTEN SIMPLICIO (State Bar No. 263291)
kristen@gutridesafier.com
San Francisco, California 94114
Telephone: (415) 271-6469
Facsimile: (415) 449-6469
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
SCOTT KOLLER, AN INDIVIDUAL, ON
BEHALF OF HIMSELF, THE GENERAL
PUBLIC, AND THOSE SIMILARLY
SITUATED,
Plaintiff,
v.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WEST BAY ACQUISTIONS, LLC;
CHRISTOPER RUNCI, LLC; CHRISTOPHER
RUNCI; TODD HARRAKA, inclusive,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 12-cv-00117 (CRB)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Case3:12-cv-00117-CRB Document60-1 Filed12/05/12 Page2 of 2
1
On December 4, 2012, the parties filed a joint stipulation for dismissal with prejudice.
2
Having carefully considered the joint stipulation, the Court is of the opinion that it should be
3
GRANTED. The Court hereby dismisses, with prejudice, Plaintiff Scott Koller’s claims against
4
Defendants West Bay Acquisitions, LLC, Christopher Runci, LLC, Christopher Runci, and Todd
5
Harraka.
6
December 10, 2012
12
13
S
RT
____________________
Hon. Charles REBreyer, United States
E R. D
District RD Judge
O O Court
IS S
16
17
yer
s R. Bre
harle
Judge C
ER
H
15
IT
NO
14
UNIT
ED
11
RT
U
O
10
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
9
FO
Dated:
LI
8
IT IS SO ORDERED
A
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice – CASE NO. 12-CV-00117 (CRB)
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?