Burdewick v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting Motion to Consolidate Cases C-11-4427 and C-12-0119 with C-11-2320CRB for all purposes.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/22/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-02320-CRB Document26 Filed02/22/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 No. C 11-02320 CRB RHONDA WHITTENBURG, ET. AL., ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES Plaintiffs, v. KOHLS CORPORATION, ET. AL., 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Defendant Kohl’s Corporation (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Consolidate 18 Burdewick v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., No. 12-119, and Shirvanian v. Kohl’s Corp., 19 No. 11-4427, with this action. Dkt. 22. Defendant filed Notice of this Motion in both of 20 these cases. See Dkt. 21 in case No. 11-4427, Dkt. 16 in case No. 12-119. Plaintiff 21 Whittenburg filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion. Dkt. 23. Plaintiff Shirvanian 22 also filed a Notice of Non-Opposition in case No. 11-4427. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff Burdewick has 23 not filed anything in response to the Notice. 24 25 26 27 28 The Court, having carefully considering the papers and evidence filed by the parties, hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b), the hearing scheduled for Friday, February 24 is VACATED; (2) Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED; Case3:11-cv-02320-CRB Document26 Filed02/22/12 Page2 of 2 1 2 (3) Burdewick v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., No. 12-119, and Shirvanian v. Kohl’s Corp., No. 11-4427, are hereby consolidated with this case for all purposes. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 22, 2012 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?