Diaz v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 20

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JUAN M. DIAZ,

No. C 12-00134 SI

8

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff,

9
v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,
Defendant(s).

/

13
On January 17, 2012, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) filed a motion to
14
dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in this foreclosure-related action. On February 13, 2012, the Court referred
15
this case to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Unit and vacated the hearing date for defendant’s
16
motion. See Doc. 14. After the Court was informed that the parties did not agree to settle plaintiff’s
17
claim at ADR, the Court reset defendant’s motion to dismiss for hearing on May 4, 2012. The Court
18
stated that plaintiff must file an opposition to defendant’s motion by April 13, 2012. Plaintiff has not
19
filed an opposition to defendant’s motion, or contacted the Court in any other way.
20
Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing to be filed no later than May
21
11, 2012, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R.
22
Civ. P. 41(b). The hearing set for May 4, 2012 is hereby VACATED.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: May 1, 2012
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge