Gross v. Symantec Corporation

Filing 48

ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CMC AND MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING TO AUGUST 3, 2012 filed by Symantec Corporation. Resetting Hearing as to 38 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Mot ion Hearing reset for 8/3/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Case Management Conference reset for 8/3/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/5/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document47 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 4 1 4 Sean P. Reis (SBN 184004) sreis@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP 30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300 Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 Telephone: (949) 459-2124 Facsimile: (949) 459-2123 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff James Gross and the Putative Class 6 KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842 MAURA L. REES, State Bar No. 191698 ANTHONY J WEIBELL, State Bar No. 238850 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 E-mail: mrees@wsgr.com; aweibell@wsgr.com 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Symantec Corporation [Additional counsel included in signature block.] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 JAMES GROSS, 18 Case No. 3:12-cv-00154-CRB Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 SYMANTEC CORPORATION, 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TO AUGUST 3, 2012 THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document47 Filed07/02/12 Page2 of 4 1 2 WHEREAS, a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) and a hearing on Symantec’s motion to dismiss were previously set by the Court for July 6, 2012; 3 WHEREAS, the Court recently issued a notice resetting these events to July 20, 2012; 4 WHEREAS, counsel for Symantec will on that date be engaged in a series of previously- 5 scheduled depositions in another matter taking place on the East Coast, and counsel for Symantec 6 scheduled these depositions during the third and fourth weeks of July in material part to avoid any 7 conflict with the previously-set CMC and hearing in this action; 8 9 WHEREAS, Symantec requested that Plaintiff agree to a two-week continuance of the CMC and hearing to August 3, 2012, and Plaintiff has so agreed; 10 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, through their counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 11 The CMC and hearing currently set for July 20, 2012 should be continued to August 3, 12 2012. 13 14 Dated: June 29, 2012 15 16 17 EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP By: WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation /s/ Benjamin Richman 24 Jay Edelson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) jedelson@edelson.com Rafey S. Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) rbalabanian@edelson.com Benjamin H. Richman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) brichman@edelson.com Chandler R. Givens (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) cgivens@edelson.com EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Telephone: (312) 589-6370 Facsimile: (312) 589-6378 25 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB 2 By: /s/ Maura L. Rees Maura L. Rees Attorneys for the Defendant SYMANTEC CORPORATION Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document47 Filed07/02/12 Page3 of 4 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 4 Pursuant to the above stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the July 20, 2012 Case Management Conference and hearing on motion to dismiss are hereby reset to August 3, 2012. 5 S harles Judge C NO 10 RT 11 ER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB 3 er R. Brey A H 12 E R NIA 9 O ORD IT IS S LI 8 Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge RED FO Dated: ___________________ July 5, 2012 UNIT ED 7 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA ___________________________ 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?