Gross v. Symantec Corporation
Filing
58
ORDER granting 57 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing filed by James Gross. Reset Hearing as to 51 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint., Motions terminated: 57 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Continuing Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing filed by James Gross. Motion Hearing/Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/15/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/11/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2012)
Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document57 Filed12/07/12 Page1 of 4
1
7
JAY EDELSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jedelson@edelson.com
RAFEY S. BALABANIAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
rbalabanian@edelson.com
BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
brichman@edelson.com
CHANDLER R. GIVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
cgivens@edelson.com
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
Fax: 312.589.6378
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class
9
14
KEITH E. EGGLETON
keggleton@wsgr.com
MAURA L. REES
mrees@wsgr.com
ANTHONY J. WEIBELL
aweibell@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: 650.493.9300
Fax: 650.565.5100
15
Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC CORP.
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
JAMES GROSS, individually and on behalf of
all others similarly situated,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON
MOTION TO DISMISS
SYMANTEC CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, and PC TOOLS, LTD., an Irish
limited company,
Date: December 14, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
Case No. 3:12-cv-00154-CRB
Defendants.
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CMC AND HEARING ON MOT. TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB
Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document57 Filed12/07/12 Page2 of 4
1
Plaintiff James Gross and Defendant Symantec Corporation (collectively, the “Parties”), by
2
and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree, subject to Court approval, to
3
continue the case management conference and hearing on Symantec’s pending motion to dismiss
4
currently set for December 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. to February 5, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. (or such other
5
date and time as the Court may set), so that they may focus their time and other resources on
6
finalizing a class action settlement of this matter, which they will ultimately present to the Court
7
for approval. In support of the instant stipulation, the Parties state as follows:
8
9
10
WHEREAS, by stipulation of the Parties, the Court has set the hearing on Symantec’s
motion and an initial case management conference in this matter for December 14, 2012 at 10:00
a.m., (Dkt. No. 56);
11
WHEREAS, on November 12, 2012, the Parties participated in an all-day mediation
12
session before John B. Bates, Jr. of JAMS in San Francisco, California, and are now in the process
13
of finalizing a class action settlement of this matter;
14
WHEREAS, in an effort to reduce the expenditure of time and other resources by the
15
Parties and the Court, and to focus on finalizing their settlement, the Parties have conferred and
16
agreed, subject to Court approval, that the case management conference and motion hearing
17
currently set for December 14th should be continued to February 5, 2013; and
18
19
WHEREAS, good cause exists to continue the case management conference and motion
hearing, and the Parties do not seek the relief contemplated herein for any improper purpose,
20
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED as follows:
21
1.
The hearing on Symantec’s motion to dismiss and the case management conference
22
currently set for December 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. shall be continued to February 5, 2013 at 10:00
23
a.m. (or such other date and time as the Court may set).
24
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CMC AND HEARING ON MOT. TO DISMISS
2
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB
Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document57 Filed12/07/12 Page3 of 4
JAMES GROSS, individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
1
2
Dated: December 7, 2012
3
SEAN P. REIS (SBN 184044)
sreis@edelson.com
EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Tel: 949.459.2124
4
5
6
7
JAY EDELSON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jedelson@edelson.com
RAFEY S. BALABANIAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
rbalabanian@edelson.com
BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
brichman@edelson.com
CHANDLER R. GIVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
cgivens@edelson.com
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
8
9
10
11
12
13
SYMANTEC CORPORATION,
14
15
Dated: December 7, 2012
16
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Anthony J. Weibell
One of Defendant’s Attorneys
KEITH E. EGGLETON
keggleton@wsgr.com
MAURA L. REES
mrees@wsgr.com
ANTHONY J. WEIBELL
aweibell@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: 650.493.9300
17
22
By: /s/ Benjamin H. Richman
One of Plaintiff’s Attorneys
//
//
//
//
//
//
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CMC AND HEARING ON MOT. TO DISMISS
3
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB
Case3:12-cv-00154-CRB Document57 Filed12/07/12 Page4 of 4
ORDER
1
1.
4
DATED:
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
December 11, 2012
S
6
7
8
RT
10
J
ER
H
11
12
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
9
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
UNIT
ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FO
5
The hearing on Symantec’s motion to dismiss and the case management conference 15 (Friday)
currently set for December 14, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. shall be continued to February 5,
2013 at 10:00 a.m.
LI
3
Pursuant to stipulation and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED:
A
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CMC AND HEARING ON MOT. TO DISMISS
4
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00154-CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?