Maa et al v. University of California San Francisco Medical Center et al

Filing 46

ORDER re 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadlines to Exchange Initial Disclosures, filed by Adrienne Green, Susan Penney, Sallly Marshall, Sam Hawgood, Nancy Aschler, Susan Desmond-Hellmann, Mark Laret, Michael Gropper, James W. Ostroff, Joshua Adler. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/18/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)

1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
John C. Hueston (164921)
2 [e-mail]
Brian Hennigan (86955)
3 [e-mail]
Eric J. Hayden (254107)
4 [e-mail]
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
5 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
Telephone: [phone]
6 Facsimile: [phone]
7 Attorneys for Defendants
8 KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (70636)
EMILY A. NUGENT (255048)
9 DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
10 Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: [phone]
11 Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
12 E-Mail: [e-mail]
13 David K. Colapinto, D.C. Bar #416390
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
14 KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP
3233 P Street, N.W.
15 Washington, D.C. 20007-2756
Tel: [phone]
16
Fax: [phone]
17 Email: [e-mail]
18 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Relator
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

21

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DR. JOHN MAA,
23 et al.,
24

Plaintiff and Relator,

25

vs.

26 DR. JAMES W. OSTROFF, et al.,
27

Defendants.

28

2825430

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-0200 JCS

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL
DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 26

1

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:

2

1) The parties have conferred and agree that because of Defendants’ pending motion to

3 dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, an extension of time is appropriate for the parties to
4 exchange initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26.
2) The parties agree that the time to make initial disclosures is extended as follows: the

5

6 parties will make initial discovery disclosures 30 days after the Court issues a ruling on the
7 pending Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendants. However, if the
8 Court grants Defendants’ motion to dismiss and gives Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint,
9 the parties’ initial disclosures will be due 30 days after Plaintiff serves an amended complaint on
10 Defendants.
3) This stipulation will not alter the date of any deadline already fixed by Court order. See

11

12 Local Rule 6-1(a).
IT IS SO STIPULATED

13

14 Dated: June 17, 2013 ___

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

15 _____________________
16

By: /s/ Eric Hayden
Eric Hayden
Attorneys for Defendants

17 Dated: June 17, 2013

KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP

18

By: /s/ David K. Colapinto
DAVID K. COLAPINTO
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Relator

RT

ER

H

23
24

R NIA

Judge Jo

Spero

FO

seph C.

NO

22

LI

Dated: June 18, 2013

ERED

O ORD

IT IS S

A

21

UNIT
ED

20

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

19

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
28

2825430

-1-

1

L.R. 5-1(i) ATTESTATION
I, Eric Hayden, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the parties’

2

3 JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES
4 PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby attest that
5 David K. Colapinto, counsel for Plaintiff-Relator, has concurred in this filing.
/s/ Eric Hayden

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2825430

-2-