Maa et al v. University of California San Francisco Medical Center et al
Filing
64
ORDER GRANTING re 63 Stipulation to File Third Amended Complaint and Setting Schedule for Defendants' Answer filed by Adrienne Green, Susan Penney, Sallly Marshall, Sam Hawgood, Nancy Aschler, Susan Desmond-Hellmann, Mark Laret, Michael Gropper, James W. Ostroff, Joshua Adler. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/7/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP
John C. Hueston (164921)
2 JHueston@irell.com
Brian Hennigan (86955)
3 BHennigan@irell.com
Eric J. Hayden (254107)
4 EHayden@irell.com
840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400
5 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324
Telephone: (949) 760-0991
6 Facsimile: (949) 760-5200
7 Attorneys for Defendants
8 KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (70636)
EMILY A. NUGENT (255048)
9 DICKSON GEESMAN LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000
10 Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: (510) 899-4670
11 Fax: (510) 899-4671
E-Mail: kathy@dicksongeesman.com
12 E-Mail: emily@dicksongeesman.com
13 David K. Colapinto, D.C. Bar #416390
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
14 KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP
3233 P Street, N.W.
15 Washington, D.C. 20007-2756
Tel: (202) 342-6980
16
Fax: (202) 342-6984
17 Email: dc@kkc.com
18 Attorneys for Plaintiff
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DR. JOHN MAA,
23 et al.,
24
Plaintiff,
25
vs.
26 DR. JAMES W. OSTROFF, et al.,
27
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-0200 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF
TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND SETTING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS'
ANSWER THERETO PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2) AND LOCAL
RULE 6-1(a)
28
2908266
JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE
FOR ANSWER
1
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
2
1) The parties have conferred and agree that in light of the Court's October 23, 2013 Order
3 granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended
4 Complaint [Dkt. No. 61], Plaintiff shall be permitted to file a Third Amended Complaint pursuant
5 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2).
2) The parties agree that Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 25, 2013 to
6
7 file a Third Amended Complaint consistent with the Court's October 23, 2013 Order [Dkt. No.
8 61].
3) Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties further agree
9
10 that Defendants shall have up to and including December 20, 2013 to serve and file an Answer to
11 Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint.
4) This stipulation will not alter the date of any deadline already fixed by Court order. See
12
13 Local Rule 6-1(a).
IT IS SO STIPULATED
14
15 Dated: November 5, 2013
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
16
By: /s/ Eric Hayden
Eric Hayden
Attorneys for Defendants
17
18
19 Dated: November 5, 2013
KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP
20
21
S
RT
ero
h C. Sp
sep
Judge Jo
ER
27
A
H
26
R NIA
Dated: 11/7/13
NO
25
FO
24
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
UNIT
ED
23
RT
U
O
22
By: /s/ David K. Colapinto
ISTRIC
David K. Colapinto
ES D
TC
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
AT
T
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
-12908266
JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE
FOR ANSWER
L.R. 5-1(i) ATTESTATION
1
I, Eric Hayden, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the parties'
2
3 JOINT STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
4 SETTING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER THERETO PURSUANT TO FED. R.
5 CIV. P. 15(a)(2) AND LOCAL RULE 6-1(a). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby
6 attest that David K. Colapinto, counsel for Plaintiff, has concurred in this filing.
/s/ Eric Hayden
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-22908266
JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE
FOR ANSWER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?