Maa et al v. University of California San Francisco Medical Center et al

Filing 64

ORDER GRANTING re 63 Stipulation to File Third Amended Complaint and Setting Schedule for Defendants' Answer filed by Adrienne Green, Susan Penney, Sallly Marshall, Sam Hawgood, Nancy Aschler, Susan Desmond-Hellmann, Mark Laret, Michael Gropper, James W. Ostroff, Joshua Adler. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/7/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 IRELL & MANELLA LLP John C. Hueston (164921) 2 JHueston@irell.com Brian Hennigan (86955) 3 BHennigan@irell.com Eric J. Hayden (254107) 4 EHayden@irell.com 840 Newport Center Drive, Suite 400 5 Newport Beach, California 92660-6324 Telephone: (949) 760-0991 6 Facsimile: (949) 760-5200 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 KATHRYN BURKETT DICKSON (70636) EMILY A. NUGENT (255048) 9 DICKSON GEESMAN LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2000 10 Oakland, California 94612 Tel.: (510) 899-4670 11 Fax: (510) 899-4671 E-Mail: kathy@dicksongeesman.com 12 E-Mail: emily@dicksongeesman.com 13 David K. Colapinto, D.C. Bar #416390 Admitted Pro Hac Vice 14 KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP 3233 P Street, N.W. 15 Washington, D.C. 20007-2756 Tel: (202) 342-6980 16 Fax: (202) 342-6984 17 Email: dc@kkc.com 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 22 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DR. JOHN MAA, 23 et al., 24 Plaintiff, 25 vs. 26 DR. JAMES W. OSTROFF, et al., 27 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-0200 JCS JOINT STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SETTING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER THERETO PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2) AND LOCAL RULE 6-1(a) 28 2908266 JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE FOR ANSWER 1 THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 2 1) The parties have conferred and agree that in light of the Court's October 23, 2013 Order 3 granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended 4 Complaint [Dkt. No. 61], Plaintiff shall be permitted to file a Third Amended Complaint pursuant 5 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). 2) The parties agree that Plaintiff shall have up to and including November 25, 2013 to 6 7 file a Third Amended Complaint consistent with the Court's October 23, 2013 Order [Dkt. No. 8 61]. 3) Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties further agree 9 10 that Defendants shall have up to and including December 20, 2013 to serve and file an Answer to 11 Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint. 4) This stipulation will not alter the date of any deadline already fixed by Court order. See 12 13 Local Rule 6-1(a). IT IS SO STIPULATED 14 15 Dated: November 5, 2013 IRELL & MANELLA LLP 16 By: /s/ Eric Hayden Eric Hayden Attorneys for Defendants 17 18 19 Dated: November 5, 2013 KOHN, KOHN & COLAPINTO, LLP 20 21 S RT ero h C. Sp sep Judge Jo ER 27 A H 26 R NIA Dated: 11/7/13 NO 25 FO 24 D RDERE OO IT IS S LI UNIT ED 23 RT U O 22 By: /s/ David K. Colapinto ISTRIC David K. Colapinto ES D TC Admitted Pro Hac Vice AT T Attorneys for Plaintiffs N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -12908266 JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE FOR ANSWER L.R. 5-1(i) ATTESTATION 1 I, Eric Hayden, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the parties' 2 3 JOINT STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND 4 SETTING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER THERETO PURSUANT TO FED. R. 5 CIV. P. 15(a)(2) AND LOCAL RULE 6-1(a). In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i), I hereby 6 attest that David K. Colapinto, counsel for Plaintiff, has concurred in this filing. /s/ Eric Hayden 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -22908266 JOINT STIPULATION TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT & SETTING SCHEDULE FOR ANSWER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?