In Re Netflix, Inc., Securities Litigation

Filing 107

STIPULATION AND ORDER on Briefing Schedule for Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 03/28/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KEITH E. EGGLETON, State Bar No. 159842
Email: [e-mail]
BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
Email: [e-mail]
RODNEY G. STRICKLAND, State Bar No. 161934
Email: [e-mail]
LUKE A. LISS, State Bar No. 247520
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, David Wells, and
Barry McCarthy

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16

In re NETFLIX, INC., SECURITIES
LITIGATION

17
18
19
20

This Document Relates To:
ALL ACTIONS.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC
CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER

1

WHEREAS, lead plaintiffs Arkansas Teacher Retirement System and State-Boston

2

Retirement System (“Lead Plaintiffs”) filed the First Amended Consolidated Class Action

3

Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws (the “Complaint”) against defendants

4

Netflix, Inc., Reed Hastings, David Wells, and Barry McCarthy (collectively, “Defendants”) on

5

March 22, 2013;
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 6(d) and 15(a)(3), Defendants’

6
7

response to the Complaint is to be filed on or before April 8, 2013;
WHEREAS, Defendants intend to file a motion to dismiss the Complaint (the “Motion to

8
9

Dismiss”);

10
11

WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agree that setting an appropriate schedule
regarding the Motion to Dismiss and related briefing is in the best interest of the parties;

12
13

THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE COURT, IT IS HEREBY
STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the undersigned, as follows:

14

1.

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 24, 2013.

15

2.

Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or

16

before May 24, 2013.

17

3.

Defendants’ reply memorandum shall be filed on or before June 7, 2013.

18

4.

Prior to the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, the parties shall meet and confer

19

regarding a hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss that is convenient for the parties and the

20

Court.

21

Dated: March 28, 2013

22

Respectfully submitted,
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

23
24
25
26

By:

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC

-1-

/s/ Rodney G. Strickland
Rodney G. Strickland
[e-mail]

1

Attorneys for Defendants Netflix Inc., Reed
Hastings, David Wells, and Barry McCarthy

2
3

Dated: March 28, 2013

4
5
6

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
Jonathan M. Plasse
Stephen W. Tountas
Serena Hallowell
140 Broadway, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8

By:

/s/ Stephen W. Tountas
Stephen W. Tountas
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12

Lead Counsel for Lead Plaintiffs
I, Rodney G. Strickland, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER. In compliance with Civil L.R. 51(i)(3), I hereby attest that the Stephen W. Tountas has concurred in this filing.

13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER

15
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17

1.
2.

18

before May 24, 2013.

20
3.

Prior to the filing of the Motion to Dismiss, the parties shall meet and confer

regarding a hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss that is convenient for the parties and the
Court.
S

DATED:

03/28/2013

26

UNIT
ED

25

RT
U
O

24

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

nti
muel Co

NO

RT

ER

H

28

a
Judge S

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-00225-SC

-2-

FO

27

R NIA

Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Judge
LI

23

Defendants’ reply memorandum shall be filed on or before June 7, 2013.

4.

21
22

Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or

A

19

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before April 24, 2013.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C