Yordy v. Plimus, Inc et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson denying without prejudice 3 Motion to Certify Class. Plaintiff may re-file a motion for class certification following completion of relevant discovery. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 KIMBERLY YORDY, 6 NO. C12-0229 TEH Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 PLIMUS, INC., and GREAT HILL PARTNERS, LLC, ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 9 Defendants. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 Plaintiff Kimberly Yordy filed a motion for class certification with her complaint. 13 She further requested that the motion be “entered and continued,” and that she be granted 14 leave to file a memorandum in support of the motion following the completion of class-wide 15 discovery. The Court finds Plaintiff’s motion to be premature and therefore DENIES it 16 without prejudice. As appears to be her intent, Plaintiff may re-file a motion for class 17 certification following completion of relevant discovery. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: 02/08/12 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?