Yordy v. Plimus, Inc et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Plimus, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Plead. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/02/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

Nickolas A. Kacprowski (SBN 242684)
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10

Jeffrey L. Willian, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jordan M. Heinz (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Sylvia Nichole Winston (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle Street
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11

Attorneys for Defendant Plimus, Inc.

6
7
8
9

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

KIMBERLY YORDY, on behalf of herself and all )
others similarly situated,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PLIMUS, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 12-CV-00229-TEH
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT PLIMUS,
INC. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
PLEAD

24

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2012, Plaintiff Kimberly Yordy filed a putative class action

25

complaint (the “Complaint”) against Defendants Plimus, Inc. (“Plimus”) and Great Hill Partners,

26

LLC (“Great Hill).

27
28

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2012, Defendants Plimus and Great Hill filed a joint motion to
dismiss the Complaint.
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

12-CV-00229-TEH

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, on March 23, 2012, Plaintiff Yordy, in response to the motion to dismiss, filed a
First Amended Class Action Complaint (“First Amended Complaint”) against Defendant Plimus.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendant Plimus must
answer or otherwise plead by April 6, 2012.

5

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their counsel, that

6

pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the time for the Defendant Plimus to answer, move, or otherwise

7

respond to the First Amended Complaint (“Response Date”) shall be extended to and including April

8

16, 2012.

9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
12

DATED: April 2, 2012

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP

13
/s/ Jordan M. Heinz
Nickolas A. Kacprowski (SBN 242684)
[e-mail]
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
555 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

Jeffrey L. Willian, P.C. (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jordan M. Heinz (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Sylvia N. Winston (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Attorneys for Defendant Plimus, Inc.

26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

2

12-CV-00229-TEH

1

DATED: April 2, 2012

EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLP

2

6

/s/ Sean Patrick Reis
Sean Patrick Reis
[e-mail]
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7

Attorney for Plaintiff

3
4
5

8
9

son

Hender

Ju

ER

17

A

H

16

R NIA

lton E.
dge The

RT

15

NO

14

FO

13

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

12

UNIT
ED

11

RT
U
O

S

10

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA 04/02/2012

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD

3

12-CV-00229-TEH