Yordy v. Plimus, Inc et al

Filing 6

ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: 3 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/20/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
10

KIMBERLY YORDY,
Plaintiff,

11

14

ORDER VACATING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

v.

12
13

Case Number 12-cv-00229 NC

Re: Docket No. 3
PLIMUS, INC. and GREAT HILL PARTNERS,
LLC.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

In this putative class action brought under California’s consumer protection laws,

18
19

Plaintiff Yordy moves for class certification. Dkt. No. 3. Defendants have not yet served an

20

answer to the complaint, and neither party has filed its consent or declination to proceed under

21

the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Because the current briefing schedule for Yordy’s motion

22

requires Defendants to file an opposition before their answer to the complaint is due under

23

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the schedule is VACATED. As this Court cannot hear the

24

motion without the consent of the parties, each party must file its consent or declination to

25

proceed under this Court’s jurisdiction by January 27, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27

DATED: January 20, 2012

28
12-cv-00229 NC
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case N o.

___________________________
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge