Yordy v. Plimus, Inc et al

Filing 6

ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: 3 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/20/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 10 KIMBERLY YORDY, Plaintiff, 11 14 ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE v. 12 13 Case Number 12-cv-00229 NC Re: Docket No. 3 PLIMUS, INC. and GREAT HILL PARTNERS, LLC., Defendants. 15 16 17 In this putative class action brought under California’s consumer protection laws, 18 19 Plaintiff Yordy moves for class certification. Dkt. No. 3. Defendants have not yet served an 20 answer to the complaint, and neither party has filed its consent or declination to proceed under 21 the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Because the current briefing schedule for Yordy’s motion 22 requires Defendants to file an opposition before their answer to the complaint is due under 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the schedule is VACATED. As this Court cannot hear the 24 motion without the consent of the parties, each party must file its consent or declination to 25 proceed under this Court’s jurisdiction by January 27, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 DATED: January 20, 2012 28 12-cv-00229 NC ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE Case N o. ___________________________ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?