Yordy v. Plimus, Inc et al
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: 3 . Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/20/12. (nclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING
Case Number 12-cv-00229 NC
Re: Docket No. 3
PLIMUS, INC. and GREAT HILL PARTNERS,
In this putative class action brought under California’s consumer protection laws,
Plaintiff Yordy moves for class certification. Dkt. No. 3. Defendants have not yet served an
answer to the complaint, and neither party has filed its consent or declination to proceed under
the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Because the current briefing schedule for Yordy’s motion
requires Defendants to file an opposition before their answer to the complaint is due under
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, the schedule is VACATED. As this Court cannot hear the
motion without the consent of the parties, each party must file its consent or declination to
proceed under this Court’s jurisdiction by January 27, 2012.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 20, 2012
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Case N o.
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?