In Re Clorox Consumer Litigation
Filing
138
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 02/18/2015. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
Post Montgomery Center
3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
4 Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
5 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com
– and –
6 STUART A. DAVIDSON
MARK DEARMAN
7 KATHLEEN L. BARBER
BAILIE L. HEIKKINEN
8 CHRISTOPHER C. MARTINS
120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
GREGORY S. ASCIOLLA
9 Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone: 561/750-3000
ROBIN A. VAN DER MEULEN
140 Broadway, 34th Floor
10 561/750-3364 (fax)
sdavidson@rgrdlaw.com
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: 212/907-0700
11 mdearman@rgrdlaw.com
kbarber@rgrdlaw.com
212/818-0477 (fax)
gasciolla@labaton.com
12 bheikkinen@rgrdlaw.com
cmartins@rgrdlaw.com
rvandermeulen@labaton.com
13
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
14
[Additional counsel appear on signature page.]
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
In re CLOROX CONSUMER LITIGATION ) Master File No. 12-cv-00280-SC
19
)
) CLASS ACTION
20 This Document Relates To:
)
) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE
21
) PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION OF
ALL ACTIONS.
) DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Parties’ Joint Stipulation
3 of Dismissal With Prejudice, the Court hereby dismisses the above-captioned case, with prejudice.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
9
LI
ER
A
H
12
am
Judge S
RT
11
ti
uel Con
NO
10
R NIA
Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Court Judge
FO
8
UNIT
ED
7
RT
U
O
6 Dated: ______________
02/18/2015
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
_____________________________
S
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING THE PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE – 12-cv-00280-SC
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?