In Re Clorox Consumer Litigation

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Briefing Schedule as to 71 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. Responses due by 6/27/2013. Replies due by 7/11/2013. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 06/10/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)

1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113)
Post Montgomery Center
3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
4 Telephone: [phone]
415/288-4534 (fax)
5 [e-mail]
– and –
6 STUART A. DAVIDSON
MARK DEARMAN
7 KATHLEEN L. BARBER
BAILIE L. HEIKKINEN
8 CHRISTOPHER C. MARTINS
120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
9 Boca Raton, FL 33432
GREGORY S. ASCIOLLA
Telephone: [phone]
ROBIN VAN DER MEULEN
10 561/750-3364 (fax)
140 Broadway, 34th Floor
[e-mail]
New York, NY 10005
11 [e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]
212/818-0477 (fax)
12 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
13
Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
14
[Additional counsel appear on signature page.]
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
In re CLOROX CONSUMER LITIGATION ) Master File No. 12-cv-00280-SC
)
19
) CLASS ACTION
)
20 This Document Relates To:
) JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO
) EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
21
ALL ACTIONS.
) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULES 6-2 AND
7-12
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the United States District Court for the

2 Northern District of California, Plaintiffs Tina Butler-Furr, Susan Doyle, Lori Kowalewski,
3 Catherine Lenz, Kristin Luszcz, Jose Segarra, and Megan Sterritt (“Plaintiffs”) and The Clorox
4 Company (“Defendant”) stipulate as follows:
5
6

RECITALS
1.

Whereas, on April 26, 2013, the Court held a case management conference and

7 entered a minute entry which scheduled a July 26, 2013 hearing on Defendant’s yet-to-be-filed
8 motion for judgment on the pleadings and directed the Parties to calculate their filing dates
9 accordingly. [Dkt. No. 70].
10

2.

Whereas, the Parties subsequently agreed to a briefing schedule that allowed

11 Defendant 30 days to file its motion (May 30, 2013) and 30 days for Plaintiffs to respond to the
12 motion (June 27, 2013). The Parties further agreed that the Defendants would have two weeks to
13 file a reply (July 11, 2013).
14

3.

Whereas, on May 30, 2013, per the Parties’ agreement, Defendant filed its

15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. On that same day, the Court generated a briefing
16 schedule which required Responses due by June 13, 2013 and Replies due by June 20, 2013.
17

4.

Whereas, pursuant to their original agreement, the Parties seek to extend

18 Plaintiffs’ deadline for submission of their response to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the
19 Pleadings by an enlargement of 14 days and Defendant’s reply to Plaintiffs’ response by an
20 enlargement of time of 21 days. If granted, Plaintiffs’ response will be due on June 27, 2013,
21 and Defendant’s reply will be due on July 11, 2013.
22

5.

Whereas, Civil Local Rule 6.2 provides, in relevant part, that a stipulated request

23 to extend time must (1) set forth with particularity, the reasons for the requested enlargement or
24 shortening of time; (2) disclose all previous time modifications in the case, whether by
25 stipulation or Court order; and (3) describe the effect the requested time modification would have
26 on the schedule for the case.
27
28
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULES 6-2 AND 7-12 - 12-cv-00280-SC

-1-

1

6.

Whereas, (1) the Parties are in need of the extensions of time to file their response

2 and reply based on the numerous arguments raised in the Defendant’s Motion that involve the
3 application of multiple state laws. If the requested extension is not granted, the Parties will be
4 prejudiced in their ability to respond and reply to the pending motion. Moreover, (2) there have
5 been no other previous time modifications in the case, and (3) the requested modifications will
6 have no impact on the schedule for the case.
7

7.

Whereas, this extension is requested in good faith and not for the purposes of

8 delay.
9

STIPULATION

10

1.

The deadline for submission of Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion for

11 Judgment on the Pleadings shall be extended to June 27, 2013;
12

2.

The deadline for submission of Defendant’s reply shall be extended to July 11,

13 2013.
14
15

Respectfully submitted,

16 DATED: June 7, 2013

ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
STUART A. DAVIDSON
MARK DEARMAN
KATHLEEN L. BARBER
BAILIE L. HEIKKINEN
CHRISTOPHER C. MARTINS

17
18
19
20
21

s/ Mark Dearman
MARK DEARMAN

22
23
24
25
26
27

120 East Palmetto Park Road, Suite 500
Boca Raton, FL 33432
Telephone: [phone]
561/750-3364 (fax)
SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
415/288-4534 (fax)

28
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULES 6-2 AND 7-12 - 12-cv-00280-SC

-2-

1
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
ROBERT M. ROTHMAN
58 South Service Road, Suite 200
Melville, NY 11747
Telephone: [phone]
631/367-1173 (fax)

2
3
4
5

9

LABATON SUCHAROW LLP
GREGORY S. ASCIOLLA
ROBIN VAN DER MEULEN
140 Broadway, 34th Floor
New York, NY 10005
Telephone: [phone]
212/818-0477 (fax)

10

Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs

11

SHEPHARD, FINKELMAN, MILLER
& SHAH, LLP
JAMES C. SHAH
35 East State Street
Media, PA 19063
Telephone: [phone]
610/891-9883 (fax)

6
7
8

12
13
14

HARKE CLASBY & BUSHMAN LLP
LANCE A. HARKE
SARAH C. ENGEL
HOWARD M. BUSHMAN
9699 NE Second Avenue
Miami, FL 33138
Telephone: [phone]
305/536-8229 (fax)

15
16
17
18
19

FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP
DAVID E. BOWER
CHRISTOPHER B. HAYES
10866 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1470
Los Angeles, CA 90024
Telephone: [phone]
424/257-2885 (fax)

20
21
22
23
24
25

Members of Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee
DATED: June 7, 2013

JENNER & BLOCK LLP
KENNETH K. LEE
KELLY M. MORRISON

26
27
28

s/ Kenneth K. Lee
KENNETH K. LEE
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULES 6-2 AND 7-12 - 12-cv-00280-SC

-3-

1
633 West 5th Street, Suite 3600
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
213/239-5199 (fax)

2
3
4

JENNER & BLOCK LLP
DEAN N. PANOS
353 N. Clark Street
Chicago, IL 60654
Telephone: [phone]
312/527-0484 (fax)

5
6
7

Attorneys for Defendant

8
9

[PROPOSED] ORDER

10

17

on

amuel C

Judge S

RT

19

_____________________________
Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Court Judge
ti
NO

18

06/07/2013
Dated: ______________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ER

A

H

20

R NIA

15

2013, and for Defendant to file its reply until July 11, 2013.

FO

14

responses to Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Dkt. No.71] until June 27,

LI

13

Northern District of California, the Court hereby extends the time for Plaintiffs to file their

S

12

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the United States District Court for the

UNIT
ED

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULES 6-2 AND 7-12 - 12-cv-00280-SC

-4-