In Re Clorox Consumer Litigation

Filing 97

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting in part and denying in part 89 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

9
10
11

IN RE CLOROX CONSUMER
LITIGATION

12
13
This Document Relates To:
14
ALL ACTIONS
15
16

) Master File No. 12-00280 SC
)
) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
) DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

17
18

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to file

19

under seal portions of their motion for class certification and

20

certain exhibits filed in support of the motion.

21

exhibits were produced by Defendant and are subject to a protective

22

order.

23

the subject material constitutes trade secrets.

24

Decl.").

25

relevant material in the public record, the Court declines to seal

26

that information.

27

subject material may be properly filed under seal.

28

ECF No. 89.

The

Defendant has filed a declaration explaining why much of
ECF No. 92 ("Lee

As Defendant does not object to filing some of the

The Court finds that the remainder of the

Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion to seal is GRANTED in part and

1

DENIED in part.

Plaintiffs shall file under seal their motion for

2

class certification, as well as exhibits 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 13,

3

and 14 to the Dearman Declaration.

4

redacted copies of the motion for class certification and exhibits

5

1, 2, 8, and 14 in the public record.

6

Defendant to ensure that the trade secrets in exhibits 1, 2, 8, and

7

14 -- identified in the Lee Declaration -- are redacted.

8

Plaintiffs' motion to seal exhibit 9 is DENIED, since Defendant

9

does not object to filing that exhibit in the public record.

Plaintiffs shall also file

Plaintiff shall work with

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13
14

March 18, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2