Mizner v. Grounds
Filing
34
Order by Hon. Charles R. Breyer granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion to Amend/Correct ;.(crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
ANTHONY ROBERT MIZNER,
12
13
14
15
Petitioner,
No. CV 12-0288 CRB
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
v.
RANDY GROUNDS,
Respondent.
16
17
Now before the Court is Anthony Robert Mizner’s request for an issuance of a
18
certificate of appealability (“COA”). A judge shall grant a COA “if the applicant has made a
19
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). “Where
20
a district court has rejected the constitutional claims on the merits, the showing required to
21
satisfy § 2253(c) is straightforward: the petitioner must demonstrate that reasonable jurists
22
would find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.”
23
Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Indeed, “a claim can be debatable even
24
though every jurist of reason might agree, after the COA has been granted and the case has
25
received full consideration, that petitioner will not prevail.” Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.
26
322, 338 (2003).
27
28
Here, the Court concludes that reasonable jurists could debate one of the two issues
for which Mizner seeks a COA. A COA is granted as to the following issue:
1
Was Mizner deprived of the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth and Fourteenth
2
Amendments when his trial attorney failed to request the sentencing court exercise its
3
discretion to sentence his possession of methamphetamine as a misdemeanor, rather than as a
4
felony?
5
6
The Court GRANTS a certificate of appealability as to this claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 31, 2013
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?