Cefalu v. Holder

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/02/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612)
United States Attorney
JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143)
Chief, Civil Division
EVAN H. PERLMAN (MA BBO 651356)
Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
Telephone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

OAKLAND DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

VINCENT A. CEFALU,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr.
U.S. Attorney General,
U.S. Department of Justice
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 12-0303 TEH
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendant United States Department of Justice (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Vincent A.

21

Cefalu (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for

22

Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint & Jury Demand (“Amended

23

Complaint”) pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Northern District of California, as

24

follows:

25

1.

On March 8, 2012, Plaintiff filed its Amended Complaint & Jury Demand under

26

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 621 et seq.

27

(“ADEA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 791 et seq. (the

28

“Rehabilitation Act”); the American with Disabilities Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101,
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
Case No. 12-0303 TEH

1

et seq. (“ADA”), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section

2

2000e-1 et seq. (“Title VII”).

3
4

2.

Amended Complaint by certified mail;

5
6

3.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), Defendant’s response to the Amended

Complaint is presently due to be filed and served on April 9, 2012;

7
8

On March 13, 2012, the U.S. Attorney’s Office received a copy of Plaintiff’s

4.

The parties have agreed to a fourteen-day extension of time for Defendant to

respond to the Amended Complaint from April 9, 2012 to April 23, 2012;

9

5.

No prior extensions of time have been requested or granted; and

10

6.

This change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by

11

Court order.

12
13

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendant
that Defendant will have until April 23, 2012 to respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

14
15

DATED: March 30, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

16
17
18

____/s/ Andrew D. Winghart_________________
ANDREW D. WINGHART
Attorneys for Plaintiff

19
20
DATED: March 30, 2012

ER

R NIA

____/s/ Evan H. Perlman____________________
EVAN H. PERLMAN
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

FO

J

H

28

elton E
udge Th

RT

27

rson

. Hende

NO

26

IT

ED

RDER
IS SO O

LI

25

UNIT
ED

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA 04/02/2012

RT
U
O

23

S

22

Respectfully submitted,
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

A

21

N

D

OF

C

IS T RIC T
STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
2
Case No. 12-0303 TEH