Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
Filing
51
ORDER of dismissal (see order for details) 7013 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/22/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST
LITIGATION
MASTER FILE NO. 07-m-1827 SI
CASE NO 3:12-cv-0335 SI
This Documents Relates To:
11
[PROPOSED] ORDER
12
13
14
ViewSonic Corporation v.
AU Optronics Corporation, et al.
Case No. 12-cv-0335 SI
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
MASTER FILE NO. MDL 07-1827I
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing,
3
orders as follows:
4
1.
Claims asserted by Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation (“Plaintiff”) against Samsung
5
Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
6
(“Defendants”) are dismissed with prejudice.
7
2.
Each of the parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
8
3.
This Order shall not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other
9
defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
10/22
Dated: ________________, 2012
14
15
Hon. Susan Y. Illston, United States District Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
DCACTIVE-21455819.1
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER
MASTER FILE NO. MDL 07-1827
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?