Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 51

ORDER of dismissal (see order for details) 7013 . Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 10/22/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 In re TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION MASTER FILE NO. 07-m-1827 SI CASE NO 3:12-cv-0335 SI This Documents Relates To: 11 [PROPOSED] ORDER 12 13 14 ViewSonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al. Case No. 12-cv-0335 SI 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW MASTER FILE NO. MDL 07-1827I [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, 3 orders as follows: 4 1. Claims asserted by Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation (“Plaintiff”) against Samsung 5 Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 6 (“Defendants”) are dismissed with prejudice. 7 2. Each of the parties shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 8 3. This Order shall not affect the rights or claims of Plaintiff against any other 9 defendant or alleged co-conspirator in the above-captioned cases. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 10/22 Dated: ________________, 2012 14 15 Hon. Susan Y. Illston, United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 DCACTIVE-21455819.1 28 C ROWELL & M ORING LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW -1[PROPOSED] ORDER MASTER FILE NO. MDL 07-1827

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?