Viewsonic Corporation v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 61

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 Stipulation filed by Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. Extending Time to Answer Second Amended Complaint by December 19, 2012. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 12/10/12. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
Mobile Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America
Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba
America Information Systems, Inc.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335-SI (N.D. Cal.)
MDL No. 1827

18

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:12-cv-0335-SI (N.D. Cal.)

19

VIEWSONIC CORPORATION,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

15
16
17

Plaintiff,

20
21
22
23

vs.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2
3
4
5
6

WHEREAS, Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation (“ViewSonic”) filed a Second Amended
Complaint (the “Complaint”) in Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI (N.D. Cal.) on October 8, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on October 22, 2012
(MDL Dkt. No. 7023);
WHEREAS, the Court granted the motion in part and denied it in part on November 28,
2012 (MDL Dkt. No. 7255);

7

WHEREAS, Defendants desire additional time to answer the Complaint;

8

WHEREAS, extending Defendants’ time to answer the Complaint will not alter the date of

9
10

any other event or deadline already fixed by the Court;
THEREFORE, ViewSonic and Defendants, by their undersigned counsel, stipulate and

11

agree as follows:

12

1.

All Defendants shall answer the Complaint by December 19, 2012.

13

2.

This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by any Defendant of any substantive

14

or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of personal or subject

15

matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

16
17
18
19

3.

This stipulation shall not be used by any Party in support of or opposition to any

arguments related to scheduling in this matter.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
Respectfully submitted,

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

DATED: December 10, 2012
By: /s/ John H. Chung
Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Martin M. Toto (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
John H. Chung (pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14

Attorneys for Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba Mobile
Display Co., Ltd., Toshiba America Electronic
Components, Inc. and Toshiba America Information
Systems, Inc.

15

By: /s/ Nathanial J. Wood

13

16
17

23

Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
Joshua C. Stokes (CA Bar No. 220214)
Nathanial J. Wood (CA Bar No. 223547)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213-622-2690
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

24

Attorneys for Plaintiff ViewSonic Corporation

18
19
20
21
22

25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau
Christopher A. Nedeau (SBN 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (SBN 124158)
James A. Nickovich (SBN 244969)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for AU Optronics Corporation and AU
Optronics Corporation America
By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
Harrison J. Frahn IV (SBN 206822)
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,
Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei
Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei
Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,
Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA,
Inc.
By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero
Melvin R. Goldman (CA SBN 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA SBN 131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA SBN 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Epson Imaging Devices Corporation
and Epson Electronics America, Inc.

26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

By: /s/ Robert E. Freitas
Robert E. Freitas (SBN 80948)
Jason S. Angell (SBN 221607)
Jerry Chen (SBN 229318)
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display
Corporation

9
10
11
12
13
14

By: /s/ Kevin C. McCann___________
Kevin C. McCann (SBN 120874)
Holly A. House (SBN 136045)
PAUL HASTINGS LLP
55 Second Street, Twenty-Fourth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-3441
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15
16

Attorneys for LG Display Co., Ltd., and LG Display
America, Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

By: /s/ John M. Grenfell
John M. Grenfell (State Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (State Bar No. 209134)
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
Andrew D. Lanphere (State Bar No. 191479)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP
SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corp.

27
28
4
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2

By: /s/ Rachel S. Brass
Rachel S. Brass (State Bar No. 219301)
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street
Suite 3000
San Francisco, California 94105-2933
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7

Attorneys for Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. and
Tatung Co. of America, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12

Attestation: The filer of this document asserts that the concurrence of the signatories
thereto has been obtained.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having considered the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause appearing,

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

10
Dated: December ___, 2012
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING THE TIME TO ANSWER SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:12-cv-0335 SI, MDL No. 1827