Custom Led, LLC v. eBay, Inc et al
Filing
94
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 93 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Amend Deadline for Filing of Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement and [proposed] Order filed by Custom LED, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 15, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KEITH R. VERGES (kverges@figdav.com)
PARKER D. YOUNG (parker.young@figdav.com)
RAYMOND E. WALKER (ray.walker@figdav.com)
FIGARI & DAVENPORT, L.L.P.
901 Main Street, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75202
Tel: (214) 939-2000
Fax: (214) 939-2090
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD
(leuthold@aol.com)
LAW OFFICE OF SHAWN T. LEUTHOLD
1671 The Alameda #303
San Jose, California 95126
Tel: (408) 924-0132
Fax: (408) 924-0134
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
CUSTOM LED LLC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
CUSTOM LED, LLC,
Plaintiff,
16
17
v.
18
EBAY INC.,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00350 (JST)
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND
DEADLINE FOR FILING OF
MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL
OF CLASS SETTLEMENT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Jury Trial Demanded
This Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order is entered into pursuant to Local Rules 6-2
and 7-12, by and between Plaintiff Custom LED, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant eBay Inc.
(“eBay”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through the respective undersigned counsel.
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2012, the Court set a schedule providing for a motion for
final approval of the parties’ settlement agreement with a deadline of 145 days from the date the
order was filed, which is on or about April 14, 2014;
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND DEADLINE FOR FILING
OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00350 (JST)
PAGE 1
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has been recently retained in two matters in which the
clients have requested temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunction and Plaintiff’s
counsel’s firm is moving office space temporarily in order to renovate their current space, all of
which has been disruptive to completing the motion for final approval;
WHEREAS Plaintiff desires to give eBay an opportunity to review the motion to, among
other things, eliminate the need for any significant response and for the preservation of any
confidential information;
WHEREAS, the hearing on final approval of the parties’ proposed settlement is set for
June 18, 2014, which is more than the 35 days set out in Local Rule 7-2(a) in which a motion
must be filed in advance of a hearing;
WHEREAS, the requested extension time will not delay the hearing on the motion for
final approval;
WHEREAS, the deadlines the Parties seek to modify have not previously been modified;
WHEREAS, counsel have met and conferred and eBay is unopposed to this proposed
extension of time;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to and request that the Court enter an order
permitting the filing of the motion for final approval on April 22, 2014.
18
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
20
21
Dated: April 14, 2014.
22
FIGARI & DAVENPORT, LLP
/s/
KEITH R. VERGES
Attorneys for Plaintiff
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: April 14, 2014.
COOLEY LLP
/s/
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (194463)
Attorneys for Defendants
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND DEADLINE FOR FILING
OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00350 (JST)
PAGE 2
2
1
ORDER
2
final approval on or before April 22, 2014.
ER
11
R NIA
nS
J u d ge J o
. Ti ga r
H
10
RT
9
NO
8
D
DERE
____________________________________
SO OR
T IS
UNITEDISTATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FO
7
April 15, 2014
Dated: _______________
A
6
LI
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff may file the motion for
UNIT
ED
3
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND DEADLINE FOR FILING
OF MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00350 (JST)
PAGE 3
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?