Thompson et al v. C & H Sugar Company, Inc et al

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 60 . Motion for Summary Judgment 54 set for 12/18/2013 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Responses due by 11/20/2013. Replies due by 12/4/2013. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 10/15/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
G. Daniel Newland, State Bar No. 87965
Justin T. Curley, State Bar No. 233287
560 Mission Street, Suite 3100
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC. and
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINERY, INC.
MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK, MILLER & JOHNSEN, P.C.
David P. Mastagni, State Bar No. 57721
Anthony P. Donoghue, State Bar No. 254113
Yoon-Woo Nam, State Bar No. 284644
1912 I Street
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JEMAR THOMPSON, et al.

15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

JEMAR THOMPSON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

19
20
21

v.
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

22

Case No. 12-cv-00391-NC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE HEARING AND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN
THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE PLAINTIFF
CRYSTAL COLEMAN

23
24
25

WHEREAS, Defendants recently filed their Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the

26

Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment Regarding Plaintiff Crystal Coleman (“Motion”), Dkt

27

Nos. 54-59;

28

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs’ request to take the
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CRYSTAL COLEMAN MSJ/MSA

Case No. 12-cv-00391-NC

1

depositions of five of Defendant C&H’s witnesses prior to Plaintiffs filing their Opposition to

2

Defendants’ Motion;

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs will not be able to take each of the depositions they wish to take
by October 18, 2013, the date their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion is currently due;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties, by
and through their respective counsel of record, as follows:
1.

The Court’s hearing on Defendants’ Motion shall be continued from November

13, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. to December 18, 2013 at 1:00 p.m.
2.

Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion not later than

Wednesday, November 20, 2013.
3.

Defendants shall file their Reply in support of their Motion not later than

Wednesday, December 4, 2013.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: October 11, 2013

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

15
By

16

s/ Justin T. Curley
G. Daniel Newland
Justin T. Curley

17

Attorneys for Defendants
C&H SUGAR COMPANY, INC., et al.

18
19

DATED: October 11, 2013

20
21

MASTAGNI, HOLSTEDT, AMICK,
MILLER & JOHNSEN, P.C.
By

s/ Anthony P. Donoghue
David P. Mastagni
Anthony P. Donoghue

22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JEMAR THOMPSON, et al.

UNIT
ED

27

NO

28

RT

2

thanael
Judge Na

M. Cousi

R NIA

______________________________
TED
GRAN
HON. NATHANAEL M. COUSINS
United States Magistrate Judge
ns

FO

Date: ____________________
October 15, 2013

H

ER
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE HEARING AND
C
N
F
BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE CRYSTAL COLEMAN MSJ/MSA D I S T R I C T O
Case No. 12-cv-00391-NC

A

26

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

IT IS SO ORDERED.
S

25

LI

24