Murray v. Time Inc.
Filing
26
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
NICHOLAS MURRAY, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
No. C 12-00431 JSW
10
ORDER VACATING HEARING
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
11
v.
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
Plaintiff,
12
TIME INC.,
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
16
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed
17
by Defendant Time, Inc. (“Time”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal
18
authority, and the record in this case, and the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition
19
without oral argument. The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 27, 2012, and the
20
Court shall issue a ruling in due course. The Court also VACATES the case management
21
conference scheduled for May 11, 2012. The Court shall set a new date, if necessary, in its
22
Order resolving the motion to dismiss.
The Court notes that, in its reply brief, Time objected to Plaintiff’s opposition brief on
23
24
the basis that it exceeds this Court’s page limitations for motions, but it did not ask the Court to
25
take any action. (Reply Br. at 15 n. 21.) Plaintiff’s brief did exceed the page limits permitted
26
by this Court. (See Standing Order ¶ 6.) All parties are advised that if they fail to comply with
27
the Court’s page limits in the future and fail to seek leave of court to exceed those limits, the
28
Court
//
1
2
3
shall strike any offending brief without further notice to the party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?