Murray v. Time Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/26/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

NICHOLAS MURRAY, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

No. C 12-00431 JSW

10

ORDER VACATING HEARING
AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

11
v.
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

Plaintiff,
12
TIME INC.,
13
Defendant.
14
/
15
16

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss filed

17

by Defendant Time, Inc. (“Time”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal

18

authority, and the record in this case, and the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition

19

without oral argument. The Court VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 27, 2012, and the

20

Court shall issue a ruling in due course. The Court also VACATES the case management

21

conference scheduled for May 11, 2012. The Court shall set a new date, if necessary, in its

22

Order resolving the motion to dismiss.
The Court notes that, in its reply brief, Time objected to Plaintiff’s opposition brief on

23
24

the basis that it exceeds this Court’s page limitations for motions, but it did not ask the Court to

25

take any action. (Reply Br. at 15 n. 21.) Plaintiff’s brief did exceed the page limits permitted

26

by this Court. (See Standing Order ¶ 6.) All parties are advised that if they fail to comply with

27

the Court’s page limits in the future and fail to seek leave of court to exceed those limits, the

28

Court
//

1
2
3

shall strike any offending brief without further notice to the party.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 26, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2