Arteris S.A.S v. Sonics, Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE re 41 Proposed Order filed by Arteris S.A.S, Sonics, Inc.. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 9, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Case3:12-cv-00434-WHA Document41 Filed07/02/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

MARK D. FOWLER (Bar No. 124235)
[e-mail]
CHANG KIM (Bar No. 273393)
[e-mail]
SUMMER KRAUSE (Bar No. 264858)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2215
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
GERALD T. SEKIMURA (Bar No. 96165)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

BRYAN WILSON (CA SBN 138842)
[e-mail]
KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS (CA SBN
197486)
[e-mail].
CHRISTOPHER F. JEU (CA SBN 247865)
[e-mail]
BENJAMIN A. PETERSEN (CA SBN 267120)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
SONICS, INC.

KEVIN C. HAMILTON (Bar No. 269423)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and CounterDefendant
ARTERIS S.A.S.

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20

ARTERIS S.A.S.

21
22
23
24

CASE NO. C 12-00434 WHA

Plaintiff,

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE
FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

v.
SONICS, INC.
Defendant.

25
26

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

27
28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. C 12-00434 WHA

Case3:12-cv-00434-WHA Document41 Filed07/02/12 Page2 of 4

1

Pursuant to paragraph 3 of the April 26, 2012 Case Management Order and Reference to

2

Magistrate Judge for Discovery Supervision, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Arteris S.A.S.

3

(“Arteris”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Sonics, Inc. (“Sonics”) submit this Proposed

4

Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction.

5
6
Event

Date

8

Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing
Statement

September 7, 2012

9

Opening Claim Construction Briefs

October 22, 2012

10

Responsive Claim Construction Briefs

November 12, 2012

11

Reply Claim Construction Briefs

November 19, 2012

Claim Construction Hearing

December 12, 2012

7

12
13
14
15

In this case Arteris is asserting two patents against Sonics, and Sonics is asserting seven

16

patents against Arteris. The Parties propose that Arteris and Sonics each be considered the

17

moving party with respect to its own patents-in-suit for purposes of the claim construction

18

briefing. The Parties therefore propose that:

19

(1) Arteris will file an opening claim construction brief as to its United States Patents Nos.

20

7,574,629 and 7,769,027 (collectively, the “Arteris Patents-in-Suit”) and Sonics will file its

21

opening claim construction brief as to its United States Patents Nos. 6,182,183, 7,266,786,

22

7,277,975, 6,961,834, 7,191,273, 6,816,814, and 7,299,155 (collectively, the “Sonics Patents-in-

23

Suit”) on October 22, 2012;

24

(2) Sonics will file its responsive claim construction brief on the Arteris Patents-in-Suit

25

and Arteris will file its responsive claim construction brief on the Sonics Patents-in-Suit on

26

November 12, 2012; and

27
28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

(3) Arteris will file its reply claim construction brief on the Arteris Patents-in-Suit and
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. C 12-00434 WHA

Case3:12-cv-00434-WHA Document41 Filed07/02/12 Page3 of 4

1

Sonics will file its reply claim construction brief on the Sonics Patents-in-Suit on November 19,

2

2012.

3
4
5

Dated: June 29, 2012
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

6
7

/s/ Summer Krause
Mark D. Fowler
Gerald T. Sekimura
Kevin C. Hamilton
Chang Kim
Summer Krause
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ARTERIS S.A.S.

8
9
10
11
12

Dated: June 29, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

13
14

/s/ Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
Bryan Wilson
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
Christopher F. Jeu
Benjamin A. Petersen
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
SONICS, INC.

15
16
17
18
19
20

Attestation of Concurrence

21

I, SUMMER KRAUSE, as the ECF user and filer of this document, attest that concurrence
22
in the filing of this document has been obtained from KIMBERLY N. VAN VOORHIS.
23
24
25

Dated:

June 29, 2012

By: /s/ Summer Krause
Summer Krause

26
27
28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

-3[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. C 12-00434 WHA

Case3:12-cv-00434-WHA Document41 Filed07/02/12 Page4 of 4

1
The Parties’ Proposed Order Re Schedule for Claim Construction is hereby GRANTED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
6

July 9, 2012.
Dated: ____________________

__________________________
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA PIPER LLP (US)

-4[PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULE FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
CASE NO. C 12-00434 WHA