Flugence v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 18

ORDER VACATING re 16 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/20/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

ROY FLUGENCE,

No. C 12-437 MEJ
Plaintiff,

8
v.
9

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
et al.,

11

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

ORDER VACATING MAY 17, 2013
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

13
14

On May 15, 2013, Defendant City and County of San Francisco filed a Motion for Summary

15 Judgment. Dkt. No. 15. On May 17, the Court denied the Motion without prejudice for failure to
16 comply with Civil Local Rule 7. Dkt. No. 16. As Defendant has now filed an Errata and Corrected
17 Notice, the May 17 Order is VACATED.
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20 Dated: May 20, 2013
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge