Flugence v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 25

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 24 Ex Parte Application to Modify the Court's June 20,2 013 Order as it relates to the Reply Brief only. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)

1
2
3

Russell A. Robinson (163937)
Law Office of Russell A. Robinson
345 Grove Street, Level One
San Francisco CA 94102
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

4
5

Counsel for Plaintiff
ROY FLUGENCE

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
ROY FLUGENCE,

11
12
13
14
15
16

) No.
C-12-0437-MEJ
)
Plaintiff,
) [PROPOSED] ORDER
)
v.
)
)
CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN )
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSIT
)
AGENCY, NATHANIEL FORD, GEORGE
)
LOUIE, and DOES 1-40,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

17
18

Pursuant to the request of Plaintiff’s counsel submitted June 21, 2013, the Court hereby

19

orders that Defendant’s reply brief to the motion for summary judgment shall be filed no later

20

than July 8, 2013.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The parties shall file a joint statement
of undisputed facts by July 3, 2013.

22
23
24

June 21, 2013
Date: __________________

___________________________________
The Honorable Maria-Elena James
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________
Flugence v. San Francisco, et al.
P031REQ
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE COURT’S
JUNE 20, 2013, ORDER AS IT RELATES TO THE
REPLY BRIEF ONLY