Dorger et al v. City of Napa et al
Filing
87
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER 12, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 3, 2013 re 86 Stipulation. Further Case Management Conference continued to 12/3/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/04/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)
Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876
BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT
The Waterfront Building
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
4
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(415)353-0999
(415)353-0990
5
Michael W. Barrett, City Attorney, State Bar No. 155968
David C. Jones, Deputy City Attorney, State Bar No. 129881
6
NAPA CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
7
CITY OF NAPA
P.O. Box 660
955 School Street
8
9
Napa, CA 94559
Telephone:
(707)257-9516
Facsimile:
(707) 257-9274
10
Attorneys for Defendants
11
CITY OF NAPA and NAPA POLICE OFFICERS
NICK DALESSI and AMY HUNTER
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
SAMANDA DORGER AND GABRIELLE
POCCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
16
SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST TO THE
ESTATE OF RICHARD POCCIA,
17
Case No. CV12-0440 WHO
STIPULATION AND TINUE NOVEMBER 12, 2013 C
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO
DECEMBER 3, 2013
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19
CITY OF NAPA: NAPA POLICE OFFICER
20
21
22
BRAD BAKER; NAPA POLICE OFFICER
NICK DALESSI; NAPA POLICE SERGEANT
AMY HUNTER,
Defendants.
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective undersigned
24
attorneys of record, as follows:
25
The Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants Motion for Summary
26
Judgment on October 24, 2013 [Docket No. 85]. The Court informed the parties after the MSJ oral
27
argument on October 16, 2013 that depending on the Court's final decision on the MSJ if the matter was
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOVING CMC DATE - USDC, Northern Dist. Case No
3:12-cv-00440 WHO
November 4, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?