Dorger et al v. City of Napa et al

Filing 87

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE NOVEMBER 12, 2013 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 3, 2013 re 86 Stipulation. Further Case Management Conference continued to 12/3/2013 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/04/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2013)

Download PDF
Gregory M. Fox, State Bar No. 070876 BERTRAND, FOX & ELLIOT The Waterfront Building 2749 Hyde Street San Francisco, California 94109 4 Telephone: Facsimile: (415)353-0999 (415)353-0990 5 Michael W. Barrett, City Attorney, State Bar No. 155968 David C. Jones, Deputy City Attorney, State Bar No. 129881 6 NAPA CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 7 CITY OF NAPA P.O. Box 660 955 School Street 8 9 Napa, CA 94559 Telephone: (707)257-9516 Facsimile: (707) 257-9274 10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 CITY OF NAPA and NAPA POLICE OFFICERS NICK DALESSI and AMY HUNTER 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 SAMANDA DORGER AND GABRIELLE POCCIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 16 SUCCESSORS-IN-INTEREST TO THE ESTATE OF RICHARD POCCIA, 17 Case No. CV12-0440 WHO STIPULATION AND TINUE NOVEMBER 12, 2013 C MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO DECEMBER 3, 2013 Plaintiffs, 18 v. 19 CITY OF NAPA: NAPA POLICE OFFICER 20 21 22 BRAD BAKER; NAPA POLICE OFFICER NICK DALESSI; NAPA POLICE SERGEANT AMY HUNTER, Defendants. 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties hereto, through their respective undersigned 24 attorneys of record, as follows: 25 The Court issued its Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants Motion for Summary 26 Judgment on October 24, 2013 [Docket No. 85]. The Court informed the parties after the MSJ oral 27 argument on October 16, 2013 that depending on the Court's final decision on the MSJ if the matter was 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MOVING CMC DATE - USDC, Northern Dist. Case No 3:12-cv-00440 WHO November 4, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?