Board of Trustees for the Western States Insulators & Allied Workers' Pension Plan et al v. Rodgers et al

Filing 46

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATION; CONTINUING DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 22, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE
WESTERN STATES INSULATORS &
ALLIED WORKERS' PENSION PLAN, et
al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART STIPULATION;
CONTINUING DEADLINES AND
TRIAL DATE

Plaintiffs,

10
v.

12

FRANK RODGERS, et al.,

13

Case No. 12-cv-00442-JST

Defendants.

14
15

The Court will not stay the case or vacate deadlines and dates. However, in order to

16

provide Plaintiff and Defendant Warner a limited period to evaluate their circumstances and

17

consider resolution of their dispute, the Court hereby CONTINUES the deadlines in this case 60

18

days. The new deadlines are as follows:

19
Event

20

Deadline

Expert disclosures

January 21, 2014

22

Expert rebuttal

February 4, 2014

23

Expert discovery cut-off

February 19, 2014

24

Deadline to file dispositive motions

March 11, 2014

25

Pretrial conference statement due

June 3, 2014

21

26
27
28

Pretrial conference

June 13, 2014
at 2:00 p.m.

Event

1

Deadline

2

June 30, 2014

Trial

at 8:30 a.m.

3
4
5
6
7

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Five

Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire

8

counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely

9

manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their

10

calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are

12

disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-

13

controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant

14

a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause

15

to grant a continuance.

16

Dated: November 22, 2013

17
18
19

_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2