Board of Trustees for the Western States Insulators & Allied Workers' Pension Plan et al v. Rodgers et al
Filing
46
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART STIPULATION; CONTINUING DEADLINES AND TRIAL DATE re 44 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 22, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE
WESTERN STATES INSULATORS &
ALLIED WORKERS' PENSION PLAN, et
al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART STIPULATION;
CONTINUING DEADLINES AND
TRIAL DATE
Plaintiffs,
10
v.
12
FRANK RODGERS, et al.,
13
Case No. 12-cv-00442-JST
Defendants.
14
15
The Court will not stay the case or vacate deadlines and dates. However, in order to
16
provide Plaintiff and Defendant Warner a limited period to evaluate their circumstances and
17
consider resolution of their dispute, the Court hereby CONTINUES the deadlines in this case 60
18
days. The new deadlines are as follows:
19
Event
20
Deadline
Expert disclosures
January 21, 2014
22
Expert rebuttal
February 4, 2014
23
Expert discovery cut-off
February 19, 2014
24
Deadline to file dispositive motions
March 11, 2014
25
Pretrial conference statement due
June 3, 2014
21
26
27
28
Pretrial conference
June 13, 2014
at 2:00 p.m.
Event
1
Deadline
2
June 30, 2014
Trial
at 8:30 a.m.
3
4
5
6
7
Estimate of trial length (in days)
Five
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
8
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
9
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
10
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
12
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, party-
13
controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
14
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
15
to grant a continuance.
16
Dated: November 22, 2013
17
18
19
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?