Campion v. Old Republic International Corporation et al
Filing
24
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 23 EXTENDING HEARING AND BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Motion Hearing set for 6/21/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)
1
7
CHAPIN FITZGERALD SULLIVAN & BOTTINI LLP
Edward D. Chapin (SBN: 053287)
echapin@cfsblaw.com
Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN: 175783)
fbottini@cfsblaw.com
Keith M. Cochran (SBN: 254346)
kcochran@cfsblaw.com
550 West C Street, Suite 2000
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: (619) 241-4810
Fax: (619) 955-5318
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Classes
2
3
4
5
6
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DOUGLAS J. CAMPION, on behalf of himself Case No. C 12-00443 RS
and all others similarly situated,
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EXTENDING HEARING AND BRIEFING ON
v.
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MODIFIED
BY THE COURT
OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL
(Civil L.R. 6-2)
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
OLD REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION
Judge: The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
COMPANY, INC., a California corporation,
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
Date Complaint Filed: January 27, 2012
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota
corporation, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Mississippi
corporation, AMERICAN GUARANTY
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, an
Oklahoma corporation, and REPUBLIC
MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, a
North Carolina corporation,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff DOUGLAS J. CAMPION on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, OLD
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. C 12-00443 RS
1
REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION COMPANY, INC., OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE
2
INSURANCE COMPANY, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,
3
AMERICAN GUARANTY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, and REPUBLIC MORTGAGE
4
INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) stipulate as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Plaintiff and Defendants hereby agree and stipulate that the hearing on Defendants’ pending
motion to dismiss shall be continued thirty (30) days;
Thus, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from May 10, 2012
to June 14, 2012; June 21, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be due fourteen (14) days prior
to the continued hearing date or by May 31, 2012;
Defendants’ reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss shall be due seven (7) days prior to
12
the continued hearing date or by June 7, 2012.
13
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED.
14
15
Dated: April 12, 2012
CHAPIN FITZGERALD SULLIVAN & BOTTINI
LLP
16
17
18
19
By: /S/ Francis A. Bottini, Jr.
Francis A. Bottini, Jr.
Attorneys for Plaintiff DOUGLAS J.
CAMPION
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. C 12-00443 RS
1
2
Dated: April 12, 2012
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
3
4
By: /S/ Eileen R. Ridley
Eileen R. Ridley
Attorneys for Defendants OLD REPUBLIC
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, OLD
REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION
COMPANY, INC., OLD REPUBLIC
NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, AMERICAN GUARANTY TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, and REPUBLIC
MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all signatories concur in filing this
stipulation.
Dated: April 12, 2012
By: /s/ Francis A. Bottini, Jr.
Francis A. Bottini, Jr.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. C 12-00443 RS
ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
17
Dated: April __, 2012
5
6
7
By:
Honorable Richard G. Seeborg
U.S. District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME
Case No. C 12-00443 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?