Campion v. Old Republic International Corporation et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 23 EXTENDING HEARING AND BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Motion Hearing set for 6/21/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 7 CHAPIN FITZGERALD SULLIVAN & BOTTINI LLP Edward D. Chapin (SBN: 053287) echapin@cfsblaw.com Francis A. Bottini, Jr. (SBN: 175783) fbottini@cfsblaw.com Keith M. Cochran (SBN: 254346) kcochran@cfsblaw.com 550 West C Street, Suite 2000 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: (619) 241-4810 Fax: (619) 955-5318 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Classes 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DOUGLAS J. CAMPION, on behalf of himself Case No. C 12-00443 RS and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING HEARING AND BRIEFING ON v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL (Civil L.R. 6-2) CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, OLD REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION Judge: The Honorable Richard G. Seeborg COMPANY, INC., a California corporation, OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE Date Complaint Filed: January 27, 2012 INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Mississippi corporation, AMERICAN GUARANTY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation, and REPUBLIC MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, a North Carolina corporation, Defendants. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff DOUGLAS J. CAMPION on behalf of himself and others similarly situated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, OLD -1STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. C 12-00443 RS 1 REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION COMPANY, INC., OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE 2 INSURANCE COMPANY, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, 3 AMERICAN GUARANTY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, and REPUBLIC MORTGAGE 4 INSURANCE COMPANY (collectively referred to as “Defendants”) stipulate as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Plaintiff and Defendants hereby agree and stipulate that the hearing on Defendants’ pending motion to dismiss shall be continued thirty (30) days; Thus, the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be continued from May 10, 2012 to June 14, 2012; June 21, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shall be due fourteen (14) days prior to the continued hearing date or by May 31, 2012; Defendants’ reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss shall be due seven (7) days prior to 12 the continued hearing date or by June 7, 2012. 13 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED. 14 15 Dated: April 12, 2012 CHAPIN FITZGERALD SULLIVAN & BOTTINI LLP 16 17 18 19 By: /S/ Francis A. Bottini, Jr. Francis A. Bottini, Jr. Attorneys for Plaintiff DOUGLAS J. CAMPION 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. C 12-00443 RS 1 2 Dated: April 12, 2012 FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 3 4 By: /S/ Eileen R. Ridley Eileen R. Ridley Attorneys for Defendants OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, OLD REPUBLIC HOME PROTECTION COMPANY, INC., OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN GUARANTY TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, and REPUBLIC MORTGAGE INSURANCE COMPANY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Pursuant to General Order No. 45 Section X(B), all signatories concur in filing this stipulation. Dated: April 12, 2012 By: /s/ Francis A. Bottini, Jr. Francis A. Bottini, Jr. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. C 12-00443 RS ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 17 Dated: April __, 2012 5 6 7 By: Honorable Richard G. Seeborg U.S. District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. C 12-00443 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?