Chanel, Inc. v. Miki Boutique, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MEDIATION. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN: 183336) akearns@kksrr.com KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-2541 Telephone: (415) 249-8330 Facsimile: (415) 249-8333 Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANEL, INC. PETER WEBER (SBN: 218473) pweber@mpbf.com MURPHY PEARSON BRADLEY & FEENEY 88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 788-1900 Facsimile: (415) 393-8087 Attorneys for Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., MEI NG, ANDREW MA, an individual, individually and joint, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE, YUMI BOUTIQUE and MIKI BOUTIQUE 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California ) corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, and ) ANDREW MA, an individual, individually and ) joint, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE, YUMI ) BOUTIQUE and MIKI BOUTIQUE and DOES ) 1-10, ) ) Defendants. CHANEL, INC., a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. CV12-0547 RS STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 24 25 26 27 28 -1_________________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS 1 2 The parties to this action, Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. and Defendants Miki Boutique, Inc., a dissolved California corporation, and Mei Ng, an individual and d/b/a Yuki Boutique, Yumi 3 Boutique, and Miki Boutique and Andrew Ma, an individual, by and through their attorneys of 4 5 6 record, hereby stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, on May 18, 2012, the Court referred this case to mediation through the Court’s 7 Mediation Program with a mediation deadline of August 16, 2012 (e-docket 15), and appointed 8 Linda Joy Kattwinkel to serve as the mediator; 9 10 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to use a private mediator in lieu of the Court appointed mediator; 11 WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled a mediation with private mediator Debra 12 13 14 Mellinkoff for July 31, 2012; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective 15 counsel, upon Order of the Court, that the Court-connected mediation program for this case is 16 vacated, and that the parties may proceed with private mediation. 17 18 19 DATED: July 9, 2012 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 20 ____________/S/________________________ Anne E. Kearns Attorneys for Plaintiff 21 22 23 DATED: July 9, 2012 MURPHY PEARSON BRADELY & FEENEY 24 25 26 ______________/S/______________________ Peter Weber, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants 27 28 -2STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS 1 IT IS SO ORDERED 2 3 4 Date: 7/17/12 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?