Chanel, Inc. v. Miki Boutique, Inc. et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE MEDIATION. Case referred to Private ADR. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
KENNETH E. KELLER (SBN 71450) kkeller@kksrr.com
ANNE E. KEARNS (SBN: 183336) akearns@kksrr.com
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
555 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-2541
Telephone:
(415) 249-8330
Facsimile:
(415) 249-8333
Attorneys for Plaintiff CHANEL, INC.
PETER WEBER (SBN: 218473) pweber@mpbf.com
MURPHY PEARSON BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone:
(415) 788-1900
Facsimile:
(415) 393-8087
Attorneys for Defendants MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., MEI NG,
ANDREW MA, an individual, individually and joint,
d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE, YUMI BOUTIQUE and MIKI BOUTIQUE
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
MIKI BOUTIQUE, INC., a dissolved California )
corporation, and MEI NG, an individual, and
)
ANDREW MA, an individual, individually and )
joint, d/b/a YUKI BOUTIQUE, YUMI
)
BOUTIQUE and MIKI BOUTIQUE and DOES )
1-10,
)
)
Defendants.
CHANEL, INC., a Delaware limited liability
company,
Case No. CV12-0547 RS
STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
24
25
26
27
28
-1_________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS
1
2
The parties to this action, Plaintiff Chanel, Inc. and Defendants Miki Boutique, Inc., a
dissolved California corporation, and Mei Ng, an individual and d/b/a Yuki Boutique, Yumi
3
Boutique, and Miki Boutique and Andrew Ma, an individual, by and through their attorneys of
4
5
6
record, hereby stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, on May 18, 2012, the Court referred this case to mediation through the Court’s
7
Mediation Program with a mediation deadline of August 16, 2012 (e-docket 15), and appointed
8
Linda Joy Kattwinkel to serve as the mediator;
9
10
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to use a private mediator in lieu of the Court appointed
mediator;
11
WHEREAS, the parties have scheduled a mediation with private mediator Debra
12
13
14
Mellinkoff for July 31, 2012;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective
15
counsel, upon Order of the Court, that the Court-connected mediation program for this case is
16
vacated, and that the parties may proceed with private mediation.
17
18
19
DATED: July 9, 2012
KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP
20
____________/S/________________________
Anne E. Kearns
Attorneys for Plaintiff
21
22
23
DATED: July 9, 2012
MURPHY PEARSON BRADELY & FEENEY
24
25
26
______________/S/______________________
Peter Weber, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendants
27
28
-2STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS
1
IT IS SO ORDERED
2
3
4
Date: 7/17/12
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION RE MEDIATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No.: CV 12-0547 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?