Cordy v. USS-Posco Industries et al
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER. Show Cause Response due by 7/18/2013. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/25/2013 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CARL CORDY,
Case No. 12-cv-00553-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, et al.,
Defendants.
Re: ECF No. 43
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE
SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER
12
13
On May 20, 2013, the parties in this case notified the Court that they had negotiated a
14
settlement of this matter, and anticipated filing “preliminary approval papers” by June 7, 2013.
15
ECF No. 42. On May 21, the Court ordered the parties to file by July 5, 2013, a stipulation of
16
dismissal or a statement explaining why they could not file such a stipulation. ECF No. 43. As of
17
the date of this Order, the parties have not complied with the Court’s May 21 order. Accordingly,
18
by July 18, 2013, each of the parties shall show cause, in writing, why that party should not be
19
sanctioned for failing to comply with a court order. See Miranda v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 710 F.2d
20
516, 521 (9th Cir. 1983) (discussing the types of sanctions that a district court may impose on a
21
noncomplying party). A hearing on this matter will be held on July 25, 2013.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 8, 2013
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?