Cordy v. USS-Posco Industries et al

Filing 44

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER. Show Cause Response due by 7/18/2013. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/25/2013 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 8, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CARL CORDY, Case No. 12-cv-00553-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 USS-POSCO INDUSTRIES, et al., Defendants. Re: ECF No. 43 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE SANCTIONED FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER 12 13 On May 20, 2013, the parties in this case notified the Court that they had negotiated a 14 settlement of this matter, and anticipated filing “preliminary approval papers” by June 7, 2013. 15 ECF No. 42. On May 21, the Court ordered the parties to file by July 5, 2013, a stipulation of 16 dismissal or a statement explaining why they could not file such a stipulation. ECF No. 43. As of 17 the date of this Order, the parties have not complied with the Court’s May 21 order. Accordingly, 18 by July 18, 2013, each of the parties shall show cause, in writing, why that party should not be 19 sanctioned for failing to comply with a court order. See Miranda v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 710 F.2d 20 516, 521 (9th Cir. 1983) (discussing the types of sanctions that a district court may impose on a 21 noncomplying party). A hearing on this matter will be held on July 25, 2013. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2013 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?