Hogya v. City of Petaluma et al
Filing
37
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 36 MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL DATE. Pretrial Conference set for 7/29/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 9/23/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 9/23/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/2/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)
1 Kimberly E. Colwell (SBN: 127604)
kcolwell@meyersnave.com
2 Anita L. Rimes (SBN: 215534)
arimes@meyersnave.com
3 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
555 12th Street, Suite 1500
4 Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 808-2000/Facsimile: (510) 444-1108
5
Attorneys for Defendants
6 CITY OF PETALUMA and OFFICER JASON
D. JUCUTAN
7
John H. Scott (SBN 72578)
8 john@scottlawfirm.net
Lizabeth N. De Vries (SBN 227215)
9 liza@scottlawfirm.net
10 W. Gordon Kaupp (SBN 226141)
gordon@scottlawfirm.net
11 SCOTT LAW FIRM
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 715
12 San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel: (415) 561-9601/Fax: (415) 561-9609
13
14 Attorneys for Plaintiff
EDWARD HOGYA
15
16
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWARD HOGYA,
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. C12-0554 RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL
SCHEDULE AND TRIAL DATE
20
CITY OF PETALUMA, JASON D.
21 JUCUTAN, DOES 1-20, Inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL DATE [C12-0554 RS]
1
2
STIPULATION
It is hereby stipulated and agreed upon by and between Plaintiff EDWARD HOGYA, as
3 authorized by his respective counsel, and Defendants CITY OF PETALUMA and JASON D.
4 JUCUTAN, as authorized by their respective counsel, that there is good cause to modify the pre5 trial schedule and trial date as set forth below as the parties are actively involved in early
6 settlement negotiations. The modified trial schedule is agreed on by both parties and will cause no
7 prejudice to either side.
8
1. All fact discovery shall be completed on or before February 15, 2013;
9
2. Expert reports shall be exchanged by March 8, 2013;
10
3. Expert rebuttal reports shall be exchanged by March 22, 2013;
11
4. All expert discovery shall be completed on or before April 12, 2013;
12
5. All dispositive motions shall be set for oral argument on or before May 27, 2013;
13
6. The Final Pre-Trial Conference shall be held on or before July 29, 2013; and,
14
7. The trial shall be set to begin on September 23, 2013.
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16 Dated: October 2, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
17
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
18
19
By:
20
21
22
23 Dated: October 2, 2012
/s/ Kimberly E. Colwell
Kimberly E. Colwell
Attorney for Defendants
CITY OF PETALUMA and OFFICER JASON
D. JUCUTAN
SCOTT LAW FIRM
24
25
By:
26
27
28
/s/ John Houston Scott
John Houston Scott
Attorney for Plaintiff
EDWARD HOGYA
1976633.1
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL DATE [C12-0554 RS]
1
2
ORDER
Having considered the Stipulation of the parties, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, this Court
3 hereby approves the foregoing stipulation, and modifies the pre-trial schedule and trial date in this
4 matter as follows:
5
1.
All fact discovery shall be completed on or before February 15, 2013;
6
2.
Expert reports shall be exchanged by March 8, 2013;
7
3.
Expert rebuttal reports shall be exchanged by March 22, 2013;
8
4.
All expert discovery shall be completed on or before April 12, 2013;
9
5.
All dispositive motions shall be set for oral argument on or before May 27, 2013;
10
6.
The Final Pre-Trial Conference shall be held on or before July 29, 2013; and,
11
7.
The trial shall be set to begin on September 23, 2013.
12
13 Dated: 10/2/12
14
15
Richard Seeborg
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULE AND TRIAL DATE [C12-0554 RS]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?