Hopland Band of Pomo Indians et al v. Salazar et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 32 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 8/24/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on July 24, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LESTER J. MARSTON
California State Bar No. 081030
RAPPORT AND MARSTON
405 West Perkins Street
Ukiah, CA 95482
Telephone: 707-462-6846
Facsimile: 707-462-4235
e-mail: marston1@pacbell.net
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOPLAND BAND OF POMO INDIANS;
ROBINSON RANCHERIA OF POMO
INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA; COYOTE
VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS;
REDDING RANCHERIA; and RINCON
BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS
OF THE RINCON RESERVATION,
CALIFORNIA,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official
)
capacity as the Secretary of the United
)
States Department of the Interior; LARRY )
ECHO HAWK, in his official capacity as the )
Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs for
)
the United States Department of the
)
Interior; and DARREN CRUZAN, in his
)
official capacity as the Deputy Bureau
)
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of )
Justice Services,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________ )
Case No. CV 12-00556 CRB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE.
DATE: September 7, 2012
TIME: 10:00 a.m.
CTRM.: 6, 17th Floor
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, and for good cause shown, the parties stipulate as
follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Counsel’s daughter was involved in an automobile accident on July
S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd
1
STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS
AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB
1
19, 2012. As a result Counsel for the plaintiffs needs an extension of time to file the
2
plaintiffs’ combined opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and
3
reply to the defendants’ opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment
4
(“Opposition/Reply Brief”). Counsel for defendants is leaving on a previously
5
scheduled family vacation on July 21, 2012 and will not be returning until August 12,
6
2012, and therefore needs additional time to file the defendants’ reply to the plaintiffs’
7
Opposition to the defendants motion for summary judgment.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
2. Plaintiffs therefore, shall file their Opposition/Reply brief on or before July
20, 2012.
3. Defendants therefore, shall file their reply to the plaintiffs’ Opposition to the
defendants motion for summary judgment on or before August 24, 2012.
4. The hearing in this case presently scheduled for September 7, 2012, shall not
be changed.
5. The Court may enter an appropriate order pursuant to this stipulation.
Respectfully Submitted,
15
16
DATED: July 20, 2012
RAPPORT AND MARSTON
17
/s/ Lester J. Marston
By:
18
Lester J. Marston
Attorney for Plaintiffs
19
20
DATED: July 20, 2012
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
21
/s/ James D. Todd, Jr. (authorized)
22
James D. Todd, Jr.
Attorney for Defendants
23
24
25
ORDER
26
Having read the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
27
28
therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the parties’ request to modify the existing
S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd
2
STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS
AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB
RT
U
O
6
RT
ER
H
7
8
. Breyer
FO
NO
harles R
Judge C
LI
5
R NIA
CHARLES R. BREYER ED
R
United States O ORDECourt Judge
District
T IS S
I
4
A
3
S
2
briefing schedule, as provided for in the above stipulation, is hereby granted.
ISTRIC
24
ES D
DATED: July ____, 2012
TC
AT
T
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd
3
STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS
AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?