Hopland Band of Pomo Indians et al v. Salazar et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 32 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 8/24/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on July 24, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LESTER J. MARSTON California State Bar No. 081030 RAPPORT AND MARSTON 405 West Perkins Street Ukiah, CA 95482 Telephone: 707-462-6846 Facsimile: 707-462-4235 e-mail: marston1@pacbell.net Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOPLAND BAND OF POMO INDIANS; ROBINSON RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS OF CALIFORNIA; COYOTE VALLEY BAND OF POMO INDIANS; REDDING RANCHERIA; and RINCON BAND OF LUISENO MISSION INDIANS OF THE RINCON RESERVATION, CALIFORNIA, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official ) capacity as the Secretary of the United ) States Department of the Interior; LARRY ) ECHO HAWK, in his official capacity as the ) Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs for ) the United States Department of the ) Interior; and DARREN CRUZAN, in his ) official capacity as the Deputy Bureau ) Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of ) Justice Services, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________ ) Case No. CV 12-00556 CRB STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. DATE: September 7, 2012 TIME: 10:00 a.m. CTRM.: 6, 17th Floor Hon. Charles R. Breyer Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, and for good cause shown, the parties stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Counsel’s daughter was involved in an automobile accident on July S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd 1 STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE; REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB 1 19, 2012. As a result Counsel for the plaintiffs needs an extension of time to file the 2 plaintiffs’ combined opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and 3 reply to the defendants’ opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment 4 (“Opposition/Reply Brief”). Counsel for defendants is leaving on a previously 5 scheduled family vacation on July 21, 2012 and will not be returning until August 12, 6 2012, and therefore needs additional time to file the defendants’ reply to the plaintiffs’ 7 Opposition to the defendants motion for summary judgment. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 2. Plaintiffs therefore, shall file their Opposition/Reply brief on or before July 20, 2012. 3. Defendants therefore, shall file their reply to the plaintiffs’ Opposition to the defendants motion for summary judgment on or before August 24, 2012. 4. The hearing in this case presently scheduled for September 7, 2012, shall not be changed. 5. The Court may enter an appropriate order pursuant to this stipulation. Respectfully Submitted, 15 16 DATED: July 20, 2012 RAPPORT AND MARSTON 17 /s/ Lester J. Marston By: 18 Lester J. Marston Attorney for Plaintiffs 19 20 DATED: July 20, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 21 /s/ James D. Todd, Jr. (authorized) 22 James D. Todd, Jr. Attorney for Defendants 23 24 25 ORDER 26 Having read the above stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing 27 28 therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the parties’ request to modify the existing S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd 2 STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE; REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB RT U O 6 RT ER H 7 8 . Breyer FO NO harles R Judge C LI 5 R NIA CHARLES R. BREYER ED R United States O ORDECourt Judge District T IS S I 4 A 3 S 2 briefing schedule, as provided for in the above stipulation, is hereby granted. ISTRIC 24 ES D DATED: July ____, 2012 TC AT T UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S:\LJM\Pldgs12\EquitFund\Stip.Modifyingbrfg.sched.wpd 3 STIPULATION TO ESTABLISH BRIEFING SCHEDULE; REDUCE NUMBER OF BRIEFS, INCREASE PAGE LIMITS AND PROPOSED ORDER IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-00556 CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?