Sledge et al v. Warner Music Group Corp.
Filing
69
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 68 SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 6/27/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/18/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
GLENN POMERANTZ (SBN 112503)
TAMERLIN GODLEY (SBN 194507)
MELINDA E. LEMOINE (SBN 235670)
ANJAN CHOUDHURY (SBN 236039)
Glenn.Pomerantz@mto.com
Tamerlin.Godley@mto.com
Melinda.LeMoine@mto.com
Anjan.Choudhury@mto.com
355 South Grand Avenue
Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone:
(213) 683-9100
Facsimile:
(213) 687-3702
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
DEBRA SLEDGE, JOAN SLEDGE,
KATHY SLEDGE LIGHTFOOT and KIM
SLEDGE ALLEN, jointly d/b/a “SISTER
SLEDGE”; RONEE BLAKLEY; and
GARY WRIGHT, on behalf of themselves
and all others similarly situated,
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
JOINT STATEMENT/STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
Judge:
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Plaintiffs,
18
19
v.
20
WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.,
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20596539.1
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
1
2
3
Plaintiffs in the above captioned consolidated action and Defendant Warner Music Group
Corp. (“WMG”) together submit this joint statement/stipulation.
On August 31, 2012, this Court granted a stay of the proceedings to allow the parties to
4
participate in settlement discussions and set a further status conference on March 14, 2013. Over
5
the course of those six months, the parties diligently participated in settlement negotiations. They
6
exchanged information and analysis to facilitate the negotiations. They participated in two full
7
day mediation sessions with the Honorable Daniel Weinstein (Ret.), and they held additional
8
phone conferences with and without the mediator.
9
On February 28, 2013, pursuant to the Court’s stay order, the parties made a joint filing
10
with the Court reporting on the status of the negotiations and requesting that the case remained
11
stayed because of the ongoing talks. The Court extended the stay, setting a Case Management
12
Conference for May 2, 2013 and asking the parties to make a joint filing regarding the status of
13
the negotiations on April 18, 2013. The Court’s order, like the first, provided that if, at the time
14
of the filing of the joint statement the parties agreed that further settlement discussions would be
15
fruitful, they could seek additional time for further negotiations. Stay Order at 3.
16
The parties have continued to diligently pursue settlement negotiations over the last two
17
months. In particular, the parties participated in an in-person settlement meeting on March 6,
18
2013. Thereafter, the parties continued their discussions by phone and email, which discussions
19
are ongoing. While the parties have not reached a settlement at this juncture, the negotiations are
20
constructive and progress has been made. All parties are committed to continuing the settlement
21
discussions at this time.
22
For these reasons, the parties jointly file this statement/stipulation to inform the Court that
23
they believe further settlement discussions would be fruitful and to seek additional time for
24
continued negotiations. Specifically, the parties hereby agree and stipulate, subject to the
25
approval of the Court, to the following:
26
1. A further Case Management Conference to be set in 60 days, subject to the
27
schedule of the Court; and shall be scheduled for 6/27/13 at 10:00 a.m.
28
2. Fourteen days before the Case Management Conference—or before that date if
20596539.1
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
1
Plaintiffs and/or WMG believe that settlement cannot be reached—the parties shall
2
file a joint statement/stipulation with the Court alerting the Court to the fact that
3
settlement could not be reached and resetting a schedule for WMG’s response to
4
the Amended Complaint (which deadline for WMG’s response shall be no sooner
5
than 30 days from the date of the joint statement) and subsequent dates and
6
deadlines. In the alternative, if the parties agree that further settlement discussions
7
would be fruitful, the parties can instead file a joint statement/stipulation seeking
8
additional time for further settlement negotiations.
9
10
Dated: April 18, 2013
Respectfully Submitted,
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Tamerlin J. Godley
Tamerlin J. Godley
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
Warner Music Group Corp.
14
15
Dated: April 18, 2013
Respectfully Submitted,
16
17
By:
19
/s/ Daniel L. Warshaw
Daniel L. Warshaw
PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP
20
Interim Lead Counsel Representative for Plaintiffs*
18
21
22
23
24
* A complete list of the attorneys for Plaintiffs is attached to the Amended Complaint.
25
26
27
28
20596539.1
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
1
Filer’s Attestation
2
I, Tamerlin J. Godley, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
3
to file this JOINT STATEMENT/STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER.
4
I hereby attest that the counsel listed above concur in this filing.
5
Dated: April 18, 2013
6
/s/ Tamerlin J. Godley
Tamerlin J. Godley
______
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20596539.1
-4-
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
1
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
4/18/13
Dated: ___________________
5
_________________________________
Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
20596539.1
-5-
JOINT STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 12-CV-0559-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?